S. Senthilkumar Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul District and Another

S. Senthilkumar vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Mar 23, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191879

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1191879
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Mar 23, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5027 of 2016
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Senthilkumar

Respondent

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to call for the records and quash the charge sheet laid against the petitioner in s.t.c.no.2829 of 2014 in crime no.136 of 2014 on the file of the judicial magistrate, nilakottai, dindigul district.) 1. this petition has been filedto call for the records and quash the charge sheet laid against the petitioner in s.t.c.no.2829 of 2014 in crime no.136 of 2014 on the file of the judicial magistrate, nilakottai, dindigul district. 2. as this court was not inclined to quash the proceedings in s.t.c.no.2829 of 2014 on the file of the learned judicial magistrate, nilakottai, dindigul district, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. permission is granted. this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn 4. at this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the trial court to dispose of the case at an early date. 5. accepting the submission, the trial court is directed to dispose of the case in s.t.c.no.2829 of 2014 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, provided the accused co-operates in conduct of the trial by cross examining witnesses contemporaneously after their examination in chief. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records and quash the charge sheet laid against the petitioner in S.T.C.No.2829 of 2014 in Crime No.136 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.)

1. This petition has been filedto call for the records and quash the charge sheet laid against the petitioner in S.T.C.No.2829 of 2014 in Crime No.136 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

2. As this Court was not inclined to quash the proceedings in S.T.C.No.2829 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3. Permission is granted. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn

4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of the case at an early date.

5. Accepting the submission, the Trial Court is directed to dispose of the case in S.T.C.No.2829 of 2014 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, provided the accused co-operates in conduct of the trial by cross examining witnesses contemporaneously after their examination in chief. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties S. Senthilkumar vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Din... Same Subject MRTP Same Judge P.N. Prakash