Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

G. Arjunan Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Police (Crime), Madurai and Another

G. Arjunan vs The Assistant Commissioner of Police (Crime), Madurai and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 20, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191288

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5843 of 2016
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G. Arjunan

Respondent

The Assistant Commissioner of Police (Crime), Madurai and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 25.2.2016.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 25.2.2016. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 25.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in crime no.606 of 2016 on 02.04.2016 for an offence under section 379 ipc. the said statement is recorded. 3. in view of the above statement made by the learned government advocate (crl.side), this court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. accordingly, the criminal original petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 25.2.2016.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 25.2.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint dated 25.02.2016, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.606 of 2016 on 02.04.2016 for an offence under Section 379 IPC. The said statement is recorded.

3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition.

Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial