Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Oathaiyandi and Others Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Development, Charitable Endowment, Chennai and Others

Oathaiyandi and Others vs The Secretary, Tamil Development, Charitable Endowment, Chennai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 07, 2016
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190733

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P (MD) No. 10083 of 2016
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Oathaiyandi and Others

Respondent

The Secretary, Tamil Development, Charitable Endowment, Chennai and Others

Excerpt

.....district and another) to pass an order directing the first respondent/the joint commissioner, hindu religious and charitable endowment department, tirunelveli to look into the representation of the petitioner, dated 18.5.2015 and to dispose of the same on merits etc within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. in view of the fact that o.a.no.2 of 2016 is pending on the file of the third respondent/the joint commissioner, hindu religious charitable and endowment department, tirunelveli, this court comes to the resultant conclusion that it is prudent for the petitioners to make proper representation before the third respondent/the joint commissioner, hindu religious charitable and endowment department, tirunelveli district in regard to the conduct of election for appointment of five non-hereditary trustees, one of them shall be a woman, from amongst the 30 pangalis of nadar community for arulmighu chidambareswarar thirukkoil, sri vinayakar kovil and arulmighu iyanthu veethu swamy thirukkovil situated at chettiapathu village, tiruchendur taluk, tuticorin district( as stated in detail in the representation dated 8.2.2016) and to seek appropriate remedy in the manner known to law and in accordance with law. 6. therefore this court grants liberty to the petitioners to make effective and efficacious representation before the third respondent/the joint commissioner, hindu religious charitable and endowment department, tirunelveli district in o.a.no.2 of 2016 which is pending before him, by means of filing necessary application/petition in terms of the ingredients of tamil nadu hindu religious and charitable endowment act, 1959 and to seek necessary relief thereto. viewed in that perspective, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the representation, dated 8.2.2016, this writ petition stands disposed of. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to take necessary steps on the basis of the Petitioner's representation dated 8.2.2016 to conduct election for appointment of five Non-Hereditary Trustees, one of them shall be a woman, from amongst the 30 Pangalis of Nadar Community for Arulmighu Chidambareswarar Thirukkoil, Sri Vinayakar Kovil and Arulmighu Iyanthu Veethu Swamy Thirukkovil situated at Chettiapathu Village, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District within the time stipulated by this Court.)

1. Heard both sides.

2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3. According to the Petitioners, this Court may pass necessary orders in directing the third respondent/The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Tirunelveli District to take necessary steps on the basis of their representation, dated 8.2.2016 to conduct election for appointment of five Non-Hereditary Trustees, one of them shall be a woman, from amongst the 30 Pangalis of Nadar Community for Arulmighu Chidambareswarar Thirukkoil, Sri Vinayakar Kovil and Arulmighu Iyanthu Veethu Swamy Thirukkovil situated at Chettiapathu Village, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District within the time fixed by this Court.

4. At this stage, it is brought to the notice of this Court on behalf of the respondents that O.A.No.2 of 2016(seeking to modify the age old scheme framed in the year 1999 in O.A.No.4 of 1999) is pending on the file of the third respondent/The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious charitable and Endowment Department, Tirunelveli District. Also, it comes to be known that on 3.6.2016, this Court in W.P.No.9820 of 2016 filed by one (N.C.Athinarayana Perumal .vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Tirunelveli District and another) to pass an order directing the first respondent/The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Tirunelveli to look into the representation of the Petitioner, dated 18.5.2015 and to dispose of the same on merits etc within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. In view of the fact that O.A.No.2 of 2016 is pending on the file of the third respondent/The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowment Department, Tirunelveli, this Court comes to the resultant conclusion that it is prudent for the Petitioners to make proper representation before the third respondent/The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowment Department, Tirunelveli District in regard to the conduct of election for appointment of five Non-Hereditary Trustees, one of them shall be a woman, from amongst the 30 Pangalis of Nadar Community for Arulmighu Chidambareswarar Thirukkoil, Sri Vinayakar Kovil and Arulmighu Iyanthu Veethu Swamy Thirukkovil situated at Chettiapathu Village, Tiruchendur Taluk, Tuticorin District( as stated in detail in the representation dated 8.2.2016) and to seek appropriate remedy in the manner known to law and in accordance with law.

6. Therefore this Court grants liberty to the Petitioners to make effective and efficacious representation before the third respondent/The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowment Department, Tirunelveli District in O.A.No.2 of 2016 which is pending before him, by means of filing necessary application/petition in terms of the ingredients of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act, 1959 and to seek necessary relief thereto. Viewed in that perspective, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the representation, dated 8.2.2016, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial