T. Thangaraj Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Erode District and Another

T. Thangaraj vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Erode District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 21, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190342

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190342
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Dr.(Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala
Decided On: Jun 21, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 8417 of 2016 & Crl.M.P.(MD) No. 4104 of 2016
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T. Thangaraj

Respondent

State represented by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Erode District and Another

Excerpt

.....in s.t.c.no.260 of 2012 pending on the file of the fast track judicial magistrate court, thanjavur to the learned chief judicial magistrate court, erode. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the intervenor and the learned government advocate (crl.side) for the respondents. brief facts: 3. the complainant/petitioner initiated proceedings under sections 138 of negotiable instruments act for the default committed by the 2nd respondent in not repaying the amount, namely, rs.15,00,000/-; that the cheque issued by the 2nd respondent, when presented, got returned with an endorsement cheque stopped ; that the petitioner also received a reply from the 2nd respondent on 15.10.2012 and that thereafter, the petitioner filed a complaint under section 138 of n.i. act, which was taken on file in stc no.260 of 2012 on the file of the fast track judicial magistrate, thanjavur. 3a. while that being the case, the 2nd respondent, with the malafide intention, preferred a complaint with the district crime branch, erode and pursuant thereto, a case was also registered in crime no.4 of 2013 on 18.02.2013 against the petitioner herein. in the meanwhile, the petitioner has approached this court with the above relief. 4. when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the intervenor has submitted that the intervenor / 2nd respondent has no objection for transfer of the case in s.t.c.no.260 of 2012 pending on the file of the fast track judicial magistrate court, thanjavur to the learned chief judicial magistrate court, erode. 5. under such circumstances, this criminal original petition is allowed and the case in in s.t.c.no.260 of 2012 pending on the file of the fast track judicial magistrate court, thanjavur is ordered to be transferred to the file of the learned chief judicial magistrate court, erode. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to order to withdraw the case in S.T.C.No.260 of 2012 on the file of the Fast Track Judicial Magistrate Court, Thanjavur and transfer the same to Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate Erode.)

1. This petition has been filed, seeking to transfer the case in S.T.C.No.260 of 2012 pending on the file of the Fast Track Judicial Magistrate Court, Thanjavur to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the intervenor and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents.

Brief Facts:

3. The complainant/petitioner initiated proceedings under Sections 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for the default committed by the 2^nd respondent in not repaying the amount, namely, Rs.15,00,000/-; that the cheque issued by the 2^nd respondent, when presented, got returned with an endorsement cheque stopped ; that the petitioner also received a reply from the 2^nd respondent on 15.10.2012 and that thereafter, the petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act, which was taken on file in STC No.260 of 2012 on the file of the Fast Track Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur.

3a. While that being the case, the 2^nd respondent, with the malafide intention, preferred a complaint with the District Crime Branch, Erode and pursuant thereto, a case was also registered in Crime No.4 of 2013 on 18.02.2013 against the petitioner herein. In the meanwhile, the petitioner has approached this Court with the above relief.

4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Intervenor has submitted that the Intervenor / 2^nd respondent has no objection for transfer of the case in S.T.C.No.260 of 2012 pending on the file of the Fast Track Judicial Magistrate Court, Thanjavur to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode.

5. Under such circumstances, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the case in in S.T.C.No.260 of 2012 pending on the file of the Fast Track Judicial Magistrate Court, Thanjavur is ordered to be transferred to the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Erode. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties T. Thangaraj vs State represented by The Inspector of Police,... Same Subject Education Same Judge The Honourable Dr.(Mrs.) Justice S. Vimala

Education Negotiable instruments negotiable instrument criminal procedure magistrate court On behalf of Has been