Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Petitioner vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jul 25, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1189621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1189621
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: The Honurable Mr. Justice M. Venugopal
Decided On: Jul 25, 2016
Case Number: Cont.P(MD)No. 70 of 2015 & W.P(MD)No. 17795 of 2014
Subject: Contempt of Court

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contempt of Court

Key legal issue: Contempt of Court

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Excerpt

1. today, the second respondent/contemnor is present before this court. 2. it is represented on behalf of the respondents that some time may be granted to comply with the order. already this court had granted time till 20.07.2016 to comply with the order passed by this court in w.p(md)no.17795 of 2014. further, it was also ordered that if the second respondent/the sub-registrar, office of the sub-registrar, lalgudi, ariyalur district fails to comply with the order passed in the writ petition before 20.7.2016, then he/she was directed to appear in person on 21.7.2016 and to explain as to why further action should not be taken in the subject- matter in issue. 3. when the matter is listed today i.e., on 25.7.2016, it is represented on behalf of the respondents that some more time may be granted to comply with the order passed by this court in w.p(md)no.17795 of 2014, dated 5.11.2014. further, it is also represented that as against the order made w.p(md)no.17795 of 2014, dated 5.11.2014, a writ appeal has been preferred and the same is in delay condonation stage. 4. since this court had already passed orders on 30.6.2016 in clear terms whereby and where-under, the second respondent/the sub-registrar, office of the sub-registrar, lalgudi, ariyalur district was directed to comply with the order passed by this court in w.p(md)no.17795 of 2014, dated 5.11.2014, before 20.7.2016 etc., this court is not further inclined to grant any further time to comply with the order passed by this court in the writ petition. 5. hence, the registry is directed to issue statutory notice to the second respondent returnable by 3.8.2016. till then, the presence of the second respondent/mallika, sub-registrar, office of the sub-registrar, lalgudi, ariyalur district is dispensed with.

Full Judgment

1. Today, the Second Respondent/Contemnor is present before this Court.

2. It is represented on behalf of the Respondents that some time may be granted to comply with the order. Already this Court had granted time till 20.07.2016 to comply with the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.17795 of 2014. Further, it was also ordered that if the Second Respondent/The Sub-Registrar, Office of the Sub-Registrar, Lalgudi, Ariyalur District fails to comply with the order passed in the Writ Petition before 20.7.2016, then he/she was directed to appear in person on 21.7.2016 and to explain as to why further action should not be taken in the subject- matter in issue.

3. When the matter is listed today I.e., on 25.7.2016, it is represented on behalf of the Respondents that some more time may be granted to comply with the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.17795 of 2014, dated 5.11.2014. Further, it is also represented that as against the order made W.P(MD)No.17795 of 2014, dated 5.11.2014, a Writ Appeal has been preferred and the same is in delay condonation stage.

4. Since this Court had already passed orders on 30.6.2016 in clear terms whereby and where-under, the Second Respondent/The Sub-Registrar, Office of the Sub-Registrar, Lalgudi, Ariyalur District was directed to comply with the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.17795 of 2014, dated 5.11.2014, before 20.7.2016 etc., this Court is not further inclined to grant any further time to comply with the order passed by this Court in the Writ Petition.

5. Hence, the Registry is directed to issue Statutory Notice to the Second Respondent returnable by 3.8.2016. Till then, the presence of the Second Respondent/Mallika, Sub-Registrar, Office of the Sub-Registrar, Lalgudi, Ariyalur District is dispensed with.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Petitioner vs Respondent Same Subject Contempt of Court Same Judge The Honurable Mr. Justice M. Venugopal