Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Petitioner vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Aug 17, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1188946

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1188946
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Aug 17, 2016
Case Number: W.P (MD) No.12536 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Excerpt

m. venugopal, j. 1. mr.a.muthukaruppan, learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents no.1 to 5 prays for three months time to remove the stones in question from the petitioners' patta land, as per communication of the 5th respondent. 2. in this regard, it is pertinently points out that already two weeks time was granted to the respondents no.1 to 5 on 18.07.2016 i.e., from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to remove the stones in question. 3. considering the request made on behalf of the respondents no.1 to 5, this court grants further three weeks time to the respondents no. 1 to 5 to remove the stones in question and the respondents no.1 to 5 are required to do the needful within the time granted by this court, without any deviation whatsoever. 4. registry is directed to list the matter on 08.09.2016

Full Judgment

M. Venugopal, J.

1. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents No.1 to 5 prays for three months time to remove the stones in question from the Petitioners' patta land, as per communication of the 5^th Respondent.

2. In this regard, it is pertinently points out that already two weeks time was granted to the Respondents No.1 to 5 on 18.07.2016 I.e., from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to remove the stones in question.

3. Considering the request made on behalf of the Respondents No.1 to 5, this Court grants further three weeks time to the Respondents No. 1 to 5 to remove the stones in question and the Respondents No.1 to 5 are required to do the needful within the time granted by this Court, without any deviation whatsoever.

4. Registry is directed to list the matter on 08.09.2016

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Petitioner vs Respondent Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M. Venugopal