Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr. Sasikumar Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Dr. Sasikumar vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 06, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187877

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(MD)No. 601 of 2012
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. Sasikumar

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District and Others

Excerpt

(prayer:petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent by directing the 3rd respondent to register a case against wrong doer by attempting to evict the petitioner from the said house.) 1. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the fifth respondent by directing the 3rd respondent to register a case against wrong doer by attempting to evict the petitioner from the said house.)

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial