Vijayan Vs. Kamila Beevi

Vijayan vs Kamila Beevi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Nov 29, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186765

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186765
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: D. Krishnakumar
Decided On: Nov 29, 2016
Case Number: C.R.P(PD)(MD)No. 1953 of 2016 & C.M.P(MD)No. 9218 of 2016
Subject: Tenancy

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Tamil Nadu Buildings(Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Section 25 -

Key legal issue: Tenancy

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijayan

Respondent

Kamila Beevi

Excerpt

tamil nadu buildings(lease and rent control) act, 1960 - section 25 -(prayer: civil revision petition filed under section 25 of the tamil nadu buildings(lease and rent control) act, 1960 praying this court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in r.c.a.no.2 of 2008, dated 8.2.2016, on the file of the rent control appellate authority(principal sub-court), tirunelveli confirming the fair and decretal order made in r.c.o.p.no.9 of 2006, dated 28.3.2007, on the file of the rent controller(principal district munsif),tirunelveli.) 1. this revision has been filed seeking for a direction to to set aside the fair and decretal order made in r.c.a.no.2 of 2008, dated 8.2.2016, on the file of the rent control appellate authority(principal sub-court), tirunelveli confirming the fair and decretal order made in r.c.o.p.no.9 of 2006, dated 28.3.2007, on the file of the rent controller(principal district munsif),tirunelveli. 2. when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking affidavit before this court stating that the petitioner/tenant will vacate the premises in question and hand-over the vacant possession of the same to the respondent/landlord on or before 31.12.2016. the petitioner/tenant also gave an undertaking regarding the payment of rent in future. the said undertaking affidavit shall form part and parcel of the record in the civil revision petition. 3. in view of the above, the civil revision petition is disposed of in above terms. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings(Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 praying this Court to set aside the fair and decretal order made in R.C.A.No.2 of 2008, dated 8.2.2016, on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority(Principal Sub-Court), Tirunelveli confirming the fair and decretal order made in R.C.O.P.No.9 of 2006, dated 28.3.2007, on the file of the Rent Controller(Principal District Munsif),Tirunelveli.)

1. This revision has been filed seeking for a direction to to set aside the fair and decretal order made in R.C.A.No.2 of 2008, dated 8.2.2016, on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority(Principal Sub-Court), Tirunelveli confirming the fair and decretal order made in R.C.O.P.No.9 of 2006, dated 28.3.2007, on the file of the Rent Controller(Principal District Munsif),Tirunelveli.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed an undertaking affidavit before this Court stating that the Petitioner/tenant will vacate the premises in question and hand-over the vacant possession of the same to the respondent/Landlord on or before 31.12.2016. The Petitioner/tenant also gave an undertaking regarding the payment of rent in future. The said Undertaking Affidavit shall form part and parcel of the record in the Civil Revision Petition.

3. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of in above terms. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Vijayan vs Kamila Beevi Same Subject Tenancy Same Judge D. Krishnakumar

Tenancy