Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A. Selvaraj Vs. The Management of Best Cost India Ltd., NoVelappan Chavady, Chennai and Another

A. Selvaraj vs The Management of Best Cost India Ltd., NoVelappan Chavady, Chennai and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 10, 2017
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186089

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMA. No. 42 of 2017 & CMP. No. 410 of 2017
Subject
Labour and Industrial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4-A (3) Compensation Appellant/ employee/foundry operator of Respondent, sought for compensation against Respondents. Court held Employer was liable to pay compensation if personal injury was caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in course of employment...

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Selvaraj

Respondent

The Management of Best Cost India Ltd., NoVelappan Chavady, Chennai and Another

Excerpt

employee's compensation act, 1923 section 4-a (3) compensation appellant/ employee/foundry operator of respondent, sought for compensation against respondents. court held employer was liable to pay compensation if personal injury was caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in course of employment and when it falls due was subject matter of decision relevant date for determination of such compensation was date of accident interest on compensation amount was payable on expiry of 30 days from date of accident, as per section 4-a(3) of act order passed by deputy commissioner of labour has to be modified operative portion of order alone was modified, directing respondent to pay compensation along with interest from expiry of thirty days from date of accident interest shall be payable till date of deposit appeal disposed of. (para 5, 6, 7) case referred: oriental insurance co. ltd. vs. siby george and others reported in 2012-iii-llj-609 (sc) p.rajan vs. chennai petroleum corporation rep. by the chief manager (personnel), manali, chennai and others reported in 2012-ii-llj-735 (mad). .....this court would have issued notice to the respondents. but, in this case notice is dispensed with, as the issue is on the question of law which is also settled and therefore notice is not necessary. 5. at this juncture, it is necessary to extract section 4-a(iii) and the same is extracted hereunder: 4-a. compensation to be paid when due and penalty for default- (1) compensation under section 4 shall be paid as soon as it falls due. (2) in cases where the employer does not accept the liability for compensation to the extent claimed, he shall be bound to make provisional payment based on the extent of liability which he accepts, and such payment shall be deposited with the commissioner or made to the [employee], as the case may be, without prejudice to the right of the [employee] to make any further claim. 3. where any employer is in default in paying the compensation due under this act within one month from the date it fell due, the commissioner shall- (a) direct the employer shall, in addition to the amount of the arrears, pay simple interest thereon at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum or at such higher rate not exceeding the maximum of the lending rates of any scheduled bank as may be specified by the central government, by notification in the official gazette, on the amount due; and (b) if, in his opinion, there is no justification for the delay, direct that the employer shall, in addition to the amount of the arrears and interest thereon, pay a further sum not exceeding fifty per cent of such amount by way of penalty: provided that an order for the payment of penalty shall not be passed under clause (b) without giving a reasonable opportunity to the employer to show cause why it should not be passed. 5. as per the decision of the hon'ble supreme court cited supra, the employer is liable to pay compensation if personal injury is caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in course of employment and when it falls due is the subject matter of.....

Full Judgment

(Pratyer: Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 against the order passed in E.C.No.333 of 2012 dated 12.01.2016 on the file of Commissioner for Employee Compensation (Deputy Commissioner of Labour-2) Teynampet, Chennai-6.)

1. The appellant, who is an employee/foundry operator of the first respondent, filed a petition for compensation in E.C.No.333 of 2012, against the respondents.

2. While awarding the compensation, the Deputy Commissioner of Labour has ordered that the amount of compensation of Rs.1,35,911/- (ordered on 12.01.2016) shall be deposited by way of demand draft, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a order copy, to the credit of Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II, Chennai -600 006; failing which the compensation shall carry interest @ 12% per annum on the expiry of 30 days from the date of accident i.e. 23.08.2011. This order is under challenge in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant would point out that the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour is against the provisions of Section 4-A (3) of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 and as per the the settled decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Siby George and others reported in2012-III-LLJ-609 (SC), the employer shall be liable to pay the compensation if personal injury is caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in course of his employment and the relevant date for determination of such compensation is the date of accident.

4. In normal circumstances, this Court would have issued notice to the respondents. But, in this case notice is dispensed with, as the issue is on the question of law which is also settled and therefore notice is not necessary.

5. At this juncture, it is necessary to extract Section 4-A(iii) and the same is extracted hereunder:

4-A. Compensation to be paid when due and penalty for default- (1) Compensation under Section 4 shall be paid as soon as it falls due.

(2) In cases where the employer does not accept the liability for compensation to the extent claimed, he shall be bound to make provisional payment based on the extent of liability which he accepts, and such payment shall be deposited with the Commissioner or made to the [employee], as the case may be, without prejudice to the right of the [employee] to make any further claim.

3. Where any employer is in default in paying the compensation due under this Act within one month from the date it fell due, the Commissioner shall-

(a) direct the employer shall, in addition to the amount of the arrears, pay simple interest thereon at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum or at such higher rate not exceeding the maximum of the lending rates of any scheduled bank as may be specified by the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, on the amount due; and

(b) if, in his opinion, there is no justification for the delay, direct that the employer shall, in addition to the amount of the arrears and interest thereon, pay a further sum not exceeding fifty per cent of such amount by way of penalty:

Provided that an order for the payment of penalty shall not be passed under clause (b) without giving a reasonable opportunity to the employer to show cause why it should not be passed.

5. As per the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court cited supra, the employer is liable to pay compensation if personal injury is caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in course of employment and when it falls due is the subject matter of decision. The relevant date for determination of such compensation is the date of accident.

6. The learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon the Judgment of this Court in P.Rajan Vs. Chennai Petroleum Corporation rep. by the Chief Manager (Personnel), Manali, Chennai and others reported in 2012-II-LLJ-735 (Mad) wherein the question with regard to the issue when the interest falls due has been determined by this Court, in which it is held that the interest on compensation amount is payable on the expiry of 30 days from the date of accident, as per Section 4-A(3) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Therefore, it is clear that the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour-2 has to be modified.

7. Accordingly, the operative portion of the order dated 12.01.2016 alone is modified, directing the first respondent to pay compensation of Rs. 1,35,911/- along with interest @ 12% per annum from the expiry of thirty days from the date of accident i.e. on the expiry of 30 days from 23.08.2011, and the interest shall be payable from 23.09.2011, till the date of deposit.

8. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial