Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pandiyan Vs. The Inspector of Police, Dindigul District

Pandiyan vs The Inspector of Police, Dindigul District

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 16, 2015
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1179164

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P(MD)No. 18982 of 2015
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pandiyan

Respondent

The Inspector of Police, Dindigul District

Excerpt

.....sri thiruppathiyan kovil @ sri gothandaramaswamy thirukovil at boolathur village, kodaikanal taluk, dindigul district, be held on 17.10.2015 between 07.00 p.m., and 10.30 p.m.; (b) there should not be any kind of obscene dance or vulgar dialogues during the performance, by anyone of the participants; (c) double meaning songs should not be played so as to spoil the minds of students and the youth; (d) no dance or songs, touching upon any political party or religion, community or caste be played; (e) no flex boards in support of any political party or religious leader be erected; (f) the function should not affect either religious or communal harmony and shall be conducted without any discrimination based on caste; (g) if there is any violation of any one of the conditions imposed, the concerned police officer is at liberty to take necessary action, as per law and stop such performance; (h) similarly, the police is empowered to stop the dance programme, if it exceeds beyond the permitted time. (i) the participants of the programme shall not intake any kind of toxic substance or liquor during the programme; (j) if there is any untoward incident took place, the village people and the organizers of the programme be made responsible for the same; and (k) the second respondent is directed to issue necessary permission, incorporating the above conditions. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to grant permission and protection for cultural event namely 'Adal Padal' scheduled to be held on 17.10.2015 at night in connection with yearly festival at Arulmigu Sri Thiruppathiyan Kovil @ Sri Gothandaramaswamy Thirukovil at Boolathur Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District.)

1. Mr.N.Manoharan, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the Respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to grant permission and protection for cultural event namely 'Adal Padal' scheduled to be held on 17.10.2015 at night in connection with yearly festival at Arulmigu Sri Thiruppathiyan Kovil @ Sri Gothandaramaswamy Thirukovil at Boolathur Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner would submit that Adal Padal Programme is being conducted by the villagers during the above said festival period. In this connection, a representation was given to the Respondents, but, however, the same was not considered by the Respondents so far and hence, the Petitioner is before this Court with this Writ Petition. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner would further submit that as the aforesaid festival is celebrated in a peaceful manner by the villagers, there will be no untoward incident by the people of the village.

5. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents, on instructions, would submit that the permission sought for by the petitioner may be granted with stringent conditions for maintaining law and order and also to avoid any untoward incident during performance of such programme.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(a) The Adal Padal programme in connection with the festival of Arulmigu Sri Thiruppathiyan Kovil @ Sri Gothandaramaswamy Thirukovil at Boolathur Village, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District, be held on 17.10.2015 between 07.00 p.m., and 10.30 p.m.;

(b) There should not be any kind of obscene dance or vulgar dialogues during the performance, by anyone of the participants;

(c) Double meaning songs should not be played so as to spoil the minds of students and the youth;

(d) No dance or songs, touching upon any political party or religion, community or caste be played;

(e) No flex boards in support of any political party or religious leader be erected;

(f) The function should not affect either religious or communal harmony and shall be conducted without any discrimination based on caste;

(g) If there is any violation of any one of the conditions imposed, the concerned Police Officer is at liberty to take necessary action, as per law and stop such performance;

(h) Similarly, the Police is empowered to stop the dance programme, if it exceeds beyond the permitted time.

(i) the participants of the programme shall not intake any kind of toxic substance or liquor during the programme;

(j) If there is any untoward incident took place, the village people and the organizers of the programme be made responsible for the same; and

(k) The second Respondent is directed to issue necessary permission, incorporating the above conditions.

No order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial