Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Tr Kuriakose Vs. Biji Kuriakose

Tr Kuriakose vs Biji Kuriakose

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 30, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1171654

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tr Kuriakose

Advocate Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh

Respondent

Biji Kuriakose

Advocate Mr. Abini Mathew, Mr. Ankur Chibber

Excerpt

$~5 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:30. h october, 2014 + cm(m) 1511/2010 tr kuriakose through: ..... petitioner mr. devesh pratap singh, advocate versus biji kuriakose through: ..... respondent mr. abini mathew, advocate for mr. ankur chibber, advocate coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur sunil gaur, j.(oral) c.m.appl.13334/2014 (for restoration) cm(m) no.1511/2010 was dismissed in default on 24th july, 2014. by way of this application, restoration of main petition is sought. a bare perusal of the aforesaid order reveals that none was present on behalf of the parties on that day. learned counsel for petitioner/applicant has placed on record copy of cause-list of 24th july, 2014 in support of the averments made in paragraph no.2 of the instant application. the averments made in paragraph no.2 of the instant application are duly supported by the copy of the cause-list placed on record today. cm(m) 1511/2010 page 1 the application is allowed and main petition i.e. cm (m) 1511/2010 is restored to its original number and position. the application is accordingly disposed of. cm(m) 1511/2010 learned counsel for petitioner submits that the matter is pending before the trial court at the stage of final arguments for the last two years and is now coming for hearing on 5th december, 2014 at this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits, on instructions from petitioner, who is present in the court, that this petition is not pressed provided a time-bound direction is given to trial court to dispose of petitioner’s petition. in view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of as not pressed with direction to trial court to dispose of petitioner’s petition within a period of three months’ from the date of hearing already fixed. trial court be apprised of this order forthwith. (sunil gaur) judge october30 2014 s cm(m) 1511/2010 page 2

Full Judgment

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:

30. h October, 2014 + CM(M) 1511/2010 TR KURIAKOSE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocate versus BIJI KURIAKOSE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Abini Mathew, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR SUNIL GAUR, J.

(ORAL) C.M.APPL.13334/2014 (for restoration) CM(M) No.1511/2010 was dismissed in default on 24th July, 2014. By way of this application, restoration of main petition is sought. A bare perusal of the aforesaid order reveals that none was present on behalf of the parties on that day. Learned counsel for petitioner/applicant has placed on record copy of cause-list of 24th July, 2014 in support of the averments made in paragraph No.2 of the instant application. The averments made in paragraph No.2 of the instant application are duly supported by the copy of the cause-list placed on record today. CM(M) 1511/2010 Page 1 The application is allowed and main petition i.e. CM (M) 1511/2010 is restored to its original number and position. The application is accordingly disposed of. CM(M) 1511/2010 Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the matter is pending before the trial court at the stage of final arguments for the last two years and is now coming for hearing on 5th December, 2014 At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits, on instructions from petitioner, who is present in the Court, that this petition is not pressed provided a time-bound direction is given to trial court to dispose of petitioner’s petition. In view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of as not pressed with direction to trial court to dispose of petitioner’s petition within a period of three months’ from the date of hearing already fixed. Trial court be apprised of this order forthwith. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE OCTOBER30 2014 s CM(M) 1511/2010 Page 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial