M.Vellaichamy Vs. State

M.Vellaichamy vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Aug 30, 2013

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1167732

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1167732
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M.Jaichandren
Decided On: Aug 30, 2013
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Vellaichamy

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....of the tamil nadu mediation and conciliation centre, high court of madras, enclosing a copy of its mediation report, dated 12.7.2013, has been received, and in the said mediation report, it is stated as follows:- ".both the petitioner and defacto commplainant present. respondent police present. parties arrived at an amicable settlement as per the terms in the mediation agreement enclosed herewith. hence the matter is sent back to the hon'ble court.".3. as the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the mediation agreement, dated 12.7.2013, this petition is listed for passing orders in terms of the said mediation agreement.4. the mediation agreement, dated 12.7.2013, signed by the parties and the counsel appearing for the petitioner, reads as follows:- ".both sides, out of their own volition and without any pressure or coercion from any side have agreed as follows:1. both the petitioner and the defacto complainant appeared before the centre along with their counsel and settled the dispute amicably.2. the defacto complainant has received the two cheques drawn on axis bank and deposited at canara bank, gudalur branch, coimbatore, for the value of rs.5,10,000/- (rupees five lakhs ten thousand only) from m/s.aviva insurance co., for himself and on behalf of his brother sundaravadivelu.3. the defacto complainant agrees to withdraw the complaint and in pursuance of the same has given a letter dated 09.07.2013 to the respondent/inspector of police, district crime branch, coimbatore in crime no.02/2013, informing that the dispute is settled and further action need not be taken in this matter. the special sub inspector of police, district crime branch, coimbatore, has produced the same which is filed along with the agreement.4. the defacto complainant reports that the dispute has been settled amicably as full and final settlement.5. in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, which is recorded under the mediation agreement, dated.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:

30. 8.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Crl.O.P.No.6621 of 2013 M.Vellaichamy .. Petitioner vs. State by The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Coimbatore (crime No.02 of 2013) .. Respondent This petition has been filed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.02 of 2012 pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For petitioner : Mr.K.M.Elango For respondent : Mr.R.Prathapkumar Government Advocate (crl.side) ORDER

This criminal original petition was referred for mediation to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, by the order of this Court, dated 19.3.2013.

2. A communication, dated 22.8.2013, of the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, enclosing a copy of its Mediation Report, dated 12.7.2013, has been received, and in the said Mediation Report, it is stated as follows:- ".Both the Petitioner and Defacto Commplainant present. Respondent Police present. Parties arrived at an amicable settlement as per the terms in the Mediation Agreement enclosed herewith. Hence the matter is sent back to the Hon'ble Court.".

3. As the parties have arrived at a settlement in terms of the Mediation Agreement, dated 12.7.2013, this petition is listed for passing orders in terms of the said Mediation Agreement.

4. The Mediation Agreement, dated 12.7.2013, signed by the parties and the counsel appearing for the petitioner, reads as follows:- ".Both sides, out of their own volition and without any pressure or coercion from any side have agreed as follows:

1. Both the Petitioner and the Defacto Complainant appeared before the Centre along with their Counsel and settled the dispute amicably.

2. The Defacto Complainant has received the two cheques drawn on Axis Bank and deposited at Canara Bank, Gudalur Branch, Coimbatore, for the value of Rs.5,10,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs ten thousand only) from M/s.Aviva Insurance Co., for himself and on behalf of his brother Sundaravadivelu.

3. The Defacto Complainant agrees to withdraw the complaint and in pursuance of the same has given a letter dated 09.07.2013 to the Respondent/Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Coimbatore in Crime No.02/2013, informing that the dispute is settled and further action need not be taken in this matter. The Special Sub Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Coimbatore, has produced the same which is filed along with the agreement.

4. The Defacto Complainant reports that the dispute has been settled amicably as full and final settlement.

5. In terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, which is recorded under the Mediation Agreement, dated 12.7.2013, and in terms of the Mediation Report, dated 12.7.2013, before the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court of Madras, this petition is disposed of, recording the terms of the Mediation Agreement, dated 12.7.2013. The terms of the Mediation Agreement, dated 12.7.2013 and the Mediation Report, dated 12.7.2013, of the Mediation Centre, shall form part of the order. 30.8.2013 INDEX : YES/NO INTERNET : YES/NO lan To: The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Coimbatore M.JAICHANDREN J., lan Crl.O.P.No.6621 of 2013 30.8.2013

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2013 Same Parties M.Vellaichamy vs State Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge M.Jaichandren