Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri Asit Kumar Dutta and anr. Vs. Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

Sri Asit Kumar Dutta and anr. vs Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Nov 03, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1166677

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri Asit Kumar Dutta and anr.

Respondent

Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

Excerpt

order sheet ga2992of 2014 with cc240of 2001 in the high court at calcutta special civil jurisdiction original side sr.asit kumar dutta & anr. versus eastern coalfields ltd.before: the hon'ble justice debangsu basak date : 3rd november, 2014. ms.ajaya mitra, adv.mr.kamal krishna chakraborty, adv..for the petitioners.mr.tilak bose, adv.mr.arindam mukherjee, adv.mr.partha basu, adv.mr.n.k.roy, adv..for the respondent. the court:-the contempt application and the amendment to the contempt application are pending adjudication. during the pendency of the both the applications, it is submitted on behalf of the eastern coalfields limited that, they are ready to issue delivery order for 11,200 m.t.of g-6 grade coal to the petitioner no.1 at the rate of the prevailing price of coal as on the date of lifting of coal. the parties are at issue as to the period of payment for taking delivery of such coal and the period for delivery of such coal. the petitioners before me contend that, they must have one year time to take delivery of the coal. they are ready to pay the rate prevailing as on the date of delivery. it is submitted on behalf of the eastern coalfileds limited that, the petitioners were ready to deposit the money within seven days as would appear from their communication dated april 23, 2001. i have considered the rival contentions. coal is a scarce resource. since, the petitioners had offered to deposit the entire sum within seven days as will appear from their letter dated april 23, 2001, in my view, interest of justice will be subserved by directing the eastern coalfields limited to issue delivery order for 11,200 m.t.of g-6 grade cola to the petitioner no.1 on the same terms of payment and delivery as of its communication dated february 1, 2001. the parties invite the court to keep the applications pending to ensure compliance. in such circumstances, both the applications will appear in the monthly list of december, 2014. (debangsu basak, j.) dg2

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET GA2992of 2014 With CC240of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Sr.ASIT KUMAR DUTTA & ANR.

Versus EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 3rd November, 2014.

Ms.Ajaya Mitra, Adv.Mr.Kamal Krishna Chakraborty, Adv..for the petitioneRs.Mr.Tilak Bose, Adv.Mr.Arindam Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Partha Basu, Adv.Mr.N.K.Roy, Adv..for the respondent.

The Court:-The contempt application and the amendment to the contempt application are pending adjudication.

During the pendency of the both the applications, it is submitted on behalf of the Eastern Coalfields Limited that, they are ready to issue delivery order for 11,200 M.T.of G-6 grade coal to the petitioner no.1 at the rate of the prevailing price of coal as on the date of lifting of coal.

The parties are at issue as to the period of payment for taking delivery of such coal and the period for delivery of such coal.

The petitioners before me contend that, they must have one year time to take delivery of the coal.

They are ready to pay the rate prevailing as on the date of delivery.

It is submitted on behalf of the Eastern Coalfileds Limited that, the petitioners were ready to deposit the money within seven days as would appear from their communication dated April 23, 2001.

I have considered the rival contentions.

Coal is a scarce resource.

Since, the petitioners had offered to deposit the entire sum within seven days as will appear from their letter dated April 23, 2001, in my view, interest of justice will be subserved by directing the Eastern Coalfields Limited to issue delivery order for 11,200 M.T.of G-6 grade cola to the petitioner no.1 on the same terms of payment and delivery as of its communication dated February 1, 2001.

The parties invite the Court to keep the applications pending to ensure compliance.

In such circumstances, both the applications will appear in the monthly list of December, 2014.

(DEBANGSU BASAK, J.) dg2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial