Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

RobIn Xavier Vs. the State of Kerala

RobIn Xavier vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2014
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1153530

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RobIn Xavier

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....for bail appl.no. 4595 of 2014 () 3 interrogation.2. in case interrogation is not completed that day, the petitioner shall appear before the officer investigating the case on any other day/days at reasonable time and place as directed by the investigating officer.3. in case the petitioner is arrested, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day.4. on such production, the petitioner shall be released on bail, if not required to be detained otherwise on his executing bond of `20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions : a. one of the sureties shall be a close bail appl.no. 4595 of 2014 () 4 relative of the petitioner. b. petitioner shall file affidavit while executing the bail bond that he is not claiming any right or relief based on any of the documents seized by the police in the search held on 13.06.2014 (as submitted by the petitioner through the senior counsel). c. petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation at all reasonable time and place. d. petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. e. petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any of the witnesses. f. in case any of conditions nos.(b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file application before the learned magistrate for cancellation of the bail appl.no. 4595 of 2014 () 5 bail granted hereby, as held in p.k.shaji v.state of kerala [air 2006 sc100. sd/- thomas p. joseph judge amv /true copy/ p.a.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH MONDAY,THE30H DAY OF JUNE20149TH ASHADHA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 4595 of 2014 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1400/2014 OF KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ------------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------- ROBIN XAVIER,S/O. LATE XAVIER, AGED53YEARS, PULIKKAL HOUSE, KOTHAMANGALAM, PIN- 682 691. BY ADVS.SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.M.A.MOHAMMED SIRAJ SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, (CRIME NO. 1400 OF 2014 OF KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.RASHEED THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON3006-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: sts THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

----------------------------- Bail Appl.No. 4595 of 2014 () ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2014 ORDER

Petitioner is accused in Crime No.1400 of 2014 of the Kothamangalam Police Station for the offences punishable under Section 17 of the Kerala Money Lenders Act 1958, Sections 3 & 4 of the Kerala Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, apprehends arrest and has filed the application. 2.Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that on getting information about the petitioner engaging in money lending business without authority and charging exorbitant interest, The police searched house of the petitioner on 13.06.2014 and seized 81 signed blank cheque leaves, 50 demand promissory notes and 20 RC books. Petitioner was not able to give proper explanation for the same. Bail Appl.No. 4595 of 2014 () 2 3.Learned Senior Advocate submits that the petitioner is engaged in money lending business on the strength of Annexure-B, licence issued from the Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Kerala. It is submitted that the documents seized are pretty old and obtained at a time when father of the petitioner was engaged in money lending business. He died about five years back. It is submitted that the petitioner is not claiming any right or interest based on any of the documents seized by the police in the search on 13.06.2014. 4.In the light of the above submission and Annexure-B, I am inclined to think that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, I am inclined to grant relief, but subject to conditions. The application is allowed as under :

1. Petitioner shall surrender before the officer investigating the case on 07.07.2014 at about 10 am for Bail Appl.No. 4595 of 2014 () 3 interrogation.

2. In case interrogation is not completed that day, the petitioner shall appear before the officer investigating the case on any other day/days at reasonable time and place as directed by the investigating officer.

3. In case the petitioner is arrested, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day.

4. On such production, the petitioner shall be released on bail, if not required to be detained otherwise on his executing bond of `20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions : a. One of the sureties shall be a close Bail Appl.No. 4595 of 2014 () 4 relative of the petitioner. b. Petitioner shall file affidavit while executing the bail bond that he is not claiming any right or relief based on any of the documents seized by the police in the search held on 13.06.2014 (as submitted by the petitioner through the Senior counsel). c. Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation at all reasonable time and place. d. Petitioner shall not get involved in any offence during the period of this bail. e. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any of the witnesses. f. In case any of conditions Nos.(b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file application before the learned magistrate for cancellation of the Bail Appl.No. 4595 of 2014 () 5 bail granted hereby, as held in P.K.Shaji v.State of Kerala [AIR 2006 SC100. sd/- THOMAS P. JOSEPH JUDGE AMV /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial