K. Sudarsanan Vs. General Manager, Ksfe Ltd. and Another

K. Sudarsanan vs General Manager, Ksfe Ltd. and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Jan 07, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1148936

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1148936
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge: P.Q. Barkath Ali, President &Amp; the Honourable Mr. V.V. Jose, Member
Decided On: Jan 07, 2014
Case Number: First Appeal No. 32 of 2013 (Arisen out of Order Dated 06/06/2012 in Case No. CC 202 of 2012 of District Alappuzha)
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K. Sudarsanan

Respondent

General Manager, Ksfe Ltd. and Another

Excerpt

p.q. barkathali: president this is an appeal filed by the complainant in cc.202/12 on the file of cdrf, alappuzha challenging the order of the forum dated, august 18, 2012 dismissing the complaint. 2. the case of the complainant as detailed in the complaint before the forum in brief is this:- complainant joined in a chitty conducted by ksfe, mavelikkara branch. he bid the chitty and obtained the amount on june 23, 2011. the opposite parties collected rs.200/- for documentation charge and rs.26/- as postal charge which they are not entitled to. the complainant claimed refund of the said amount and compensation of rs.50,000/-. 3. first opposite party is general manager, ksfe limited, thrissur. second opposite party is its branch manager at mavelikkara. they in their version contended that no excess amount is collected from the complainant and that chit amount has been already disbursed by the complainant. the forum heard both sides and found that opposite parties have disbursed the entire chit amount to the complainant and only that the opposite parties legally deducted rs.200/- towards documentation charge and rs.26/- towards postal charge and dismissed the complaint. complainant has come up in appeal challenging the said order of the forum. 4. it is revealed from the copy of the voucher produced by the opposite parties to show that they have deducted rs.200/- towards the documentation charge and rs.26/- towards postage charge. no evidence is adduced by the complainant to show that the opposite parties are not entitled to deduct those amount. therefore forum is perfectly justified in dismissing the complaint. in the result we find no merit in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

P.Q. Barkathali: President

This is an appeal filed by the complainant in CC.202/12 on the file of CDRF, Alappuzha challenging the order of the Forum dated, August 18, 2012 dismissing the complaint.

2. The case of the complainant as detailed in the complaint before the Forum in brief is this:-

Complainant joined in a chitty conducted by KSFE, Mavelikkara Branch. He bid the chitty and obtained the amount on June 23, 2011. The opposite parties collected Rs.200/- for documentation charge and Rs.26/- as postal charge which they are not entitled to. The complainant claimed refund of the said amount and compensation of Rs.50,000/-.

3. First opposite party is General Manager, KSFE Limited, Thrissur. Second opposite party is its Branch Manager at Mavelikkara. They in their version contended that no excess amount is collected from the complainant and that chit amount has been already disbursed by the complainant. The Forum heard both sides and found that opposite parties have disbursed the entire chit amount to the complainant and only that the opposite parties legally deducted Rs.200/- towards documentation charge and Rs.26/- towards postal charge and dismissed the complaint. Complainant has come up in appeal challenging the said order of the Forum.

4. It is revealed from the copy of the voucher produced by the opposite parties to show that they have deducted Rs.200/- towards the documentation charge and Rs.26/- towards postage charge. No evidence is adduced by the complainant to show that the opposite parties are not entitled to deduct those amount. Therefore Forum is perfectly justified in dismissing the complaint.

In the result we find no merit in this appeal and the same is hereby dismissed.

Same Court & Year Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thi... Same Parties K. Sudarsanan vs General Manager, Ksfe Ltd. and Another Same Subject Education Same Judge P.Q. Barkath Ali, President &Amp; the Honourable Mr. V.V. Jos...