Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satheeshkumar Vs. State of Kerala

Satheeshkumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 30, 2014
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1143406

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Election

Key legal issue
Election

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satheeshkumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....r/w 34 of ipc. apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.2. the 1st petitioner is the husband of the complainant. the 2nd petitioner is the mother of the 1st petitioner. it is alleged that the accused persons subjected the defacto complainant to physical and mental cruelty. it is also alleged that the 1st accused beat the complainant and inflicted injury with weapon and also bit on her back.3. the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant beat the 2nd petitioner with a wood and caused injury on the back of the head of the 2nd petitioner b.a. no.3735/2014 -2- and that this case has been filed as a defense to that case.4. considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer within ten days from today. after interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned magistrate. when applied for bail by the accused, the learned magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioners but on the following conditions: a. the petitioners shall execute a bond for rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate. if in case the magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds b.a. no.3735/2014 -3- of the sureties. b. the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer and the 1st petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer on all mondays between 9.30 am to 11.30 am until further orders. c. the petitioners shall surrender their original passports before the learned jurisdictional magistrate. if they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the magistrate. d. the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE30H DAY OF MAY20149TH JYAISHTA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 3735 of 2014 -------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 142/2014 OF PERUMPETTY POLICE STATION , PATHANAMTITTA --------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED1& 2: ---------------------------------------------- 1. SATHEESHKUMAR, AGED32YEARS THANNIKKUZHIYIL, KOTTANAD P.O.

2. OMANAYAMMA, AGED70YEARS, THANNIKKUZHIYIL, KOTTANAD P.O. BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON3005-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

------------------------------------------ B.A. No. 3735 of 2014 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 30th day of May, 2014 ORDER

Petitioners are accused in Crime No.142/2014 of Perumpetty Police Station, Pathanamthitta District. Offences alleged are under sections 323, 324 and 498A r/w 34 of IPC. Apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.

2. The 1st petitioner is the husband of the complainant. The 2nd petitioner is the mother of the 1st petitioner. It is alleged that the accused persons subjected the defacto complainant to physical and mental cruelty. It is also alleged that the 1st accused beat the complainant and inflicted injury with weapon and also bit on her back.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant beat the 2nd petitioner with a wood and caused injury on the back of the head of the 2nd petitioner B.A. No.3735/2014 -2- and that this case has been filed as a defense to that case.

4. Considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: The petitioners shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today. After interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned Magistrate. When applied for bail by the accused, the learned Magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioners but on the following conditions: a. The petitioners shall execute a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds B.A. No.3735/2014 -3- of the sureties. b. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and the 1st petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM until further orders. c. The petitioners shall surrender their original passports before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. If they are not having any valid passport, they should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate. d. The petitioners will also file an affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade B.A. No.3735/2014 -4- him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. e. The petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the learned Magistrate. f. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc. Sd/- N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge jjj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial