Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mathukutty Vs. State of Kerala

Mathukutty vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 28, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1142651

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mathukutty

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....oachira police station on 04.06.2014 at 10.00 am for interrogation.2. in case interrogation of the petitioner is not completed that day, it is open to the investigating officer to direct presence of the petitioner on any other day/days and time which the petitioner shall comply.3. petitioner shall co-operate with investigation of the case.4. in case arrest of the petitioner is recorded, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day.5. on such production learned magistrate shall release the petitioner on bail ( if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions: a) one of the sureties shall be a close bail appl. no.3533 of 2014 3 relative of the petitioner. b) petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. c) petitioner shall not get involved any offence during the period of this bail. d) petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses. e) petitioner shall not engage in money lending business without obtaining permission from the appropriate authorities. g) in case any of condition nos.(b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file application before the learned magistrate for cancellation of the bail granted hereby, as held in p.k. shaji v. state of kerala (air 2006 sc100. sd/- thomas p. joseph judge /true copy / ns p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH WEDNESDAY, THE28H DAY OF MAY20147TH JYAISHTA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 3533 of 2014 --------------------------------------- * CRIME NO. 833/2014 OF OCHIRA POLICE STATION , KOLLAM * CRIME NO. IS CORRECTED AS8322014 OF KARUNAGAPPALY POLICE STATION, VIDE ORDER

DATED28052014 IN CRL.M.A NO.4984 OF2014 ----------- PETITIONER/(* 2ND ACCUSED) * RANK OF THE ACCUSED IS CORRECTED AS SOLE ACCUSED, VIDE ORDER

DATED2805/2014 IN CRL.M.A.NO.4984 OF2014 MATHUKUTTY, AGED75YEARS, S/O.EAPPAN, 250, KOCHU VEETTIL, 4 CHANGANKULANGARA, OACHIRA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.SIJU RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OACHIRA POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.LALIZA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2805-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Msd. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.

-------------------------------- Bail Appl. No.3533 of 2014 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May 2014 ORDER

Petitioner is accused in Crime No.832 of 2014 of the Oachira Police station for the offences punishable under Sec.17 of the Kerala Money Lenders Act, apprehends arrest and has filed the application.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that, on getting information that the petitioner is engaged in money lending without authority, the Police searched house of the petitioner and seized several documents including a signed blank cheque.

3. Learned counsel submitted that the documents are of the year 2007 and that for the last 8 years the petitioner is not doing any business. He is now aged about 78 years.

4. Having regard to the relevant circumstances, I am inclined to issue directions. The application is disposed of as under.

1. Petitioner shall surrender before the officer investigating Crime No.832 of 2014 of Bail Appl. No.3533 of 2014 2 the Oachira Police station on 04.06.2014 at 10.00 am for interrogation.

2. In case interrogation of the petitioner is not completed that day, it is open to the investigating officer to direct presence of the petitioner on any other day/days and time which the petitioner shall comply.

3. Petitioner shall co-operate with investigation of the case.

4. In case arrest of the petitioner is recorded, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day.

5. On such production learned magistrate shall release the petitioner on bail ( if not required to be detained otherwise) on his executing bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions: a) One of the sureties shall be a close Bail Appl. No.3533 of 2014 3 relative of the petitioner. b) Petitioner shall report to the investigating officer as and when required for interrogation. c) Petitioner shall not get involved any offence during the period of this bail. d) Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses. e) Petitioner shall not engage in money lending business without obtaining permission from the appropriate authorities. g) In case any of condition nos.(b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file application before the learned magistrate for cancellation of the bail granted hereby, as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR 2006 SC100. Sd/- THOMAS P. JOSEPH JUDGE /True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial