Sheetal Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Sheetal vs State of Haryana and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 29, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1142138

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1142138
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: May 29, 2014
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheetal

Respondent

State of Haryana and Others

Excerpt

.....district health and family welfare society-respondent no.3. after arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would make a detailed representation claiming therein the benefit of marks which were required to be assigned to her, she being resident of district gurgaon as per the criteria laid down for selection, copy whereof has been appended as annexure p-4, which information has been supplied to the petitioner under the right to information act by the mission director, national rural health mission, haryana. the said representation, counsel states, will be submitted to respondent no.3 within a period of one week from today, which may be directed to be considered and kumar ramesh 2014.05.30 09:41 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh civil writ petition no.9542 of 2014 {2} decided within some specified time. in view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merit of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation to the civil surgeon-cum-chairman, district health and family welfare society-respondent no.3 within a period of one week from today. if such a representation is filed within the stipulated period, the same shall be considered and decided by said respondent no.3 within a period of ten days of submission of such representation. in case the claim of the petitioner is not to be accepted, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner forthwith. may 29, 2014 ( augustine george masih ) ramesh judge kumar ramesh 2014.05.30 09:41 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh

Full Judgment

Civil Writ Petition No.9542 of 2014 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: May 29, 2014 Sheetal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr.Kunal Dawar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.(ORAL) Petitioner has approached this Court assailing the selection and appointment of Sanjeet Kaidain-respondent No.4 on the post of Occupational Therapist/Physiotherapist in pursuance to advertisement dated 23.01.2014 (Annexure P-1) issued by the District Health and Family Welfare Society-respondent No.3.

After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would make a detailed representation claiming therein the benefit of marks which were required to be assigned to her, she being resident of District Gurgaon as per the criteria laid down for selection, copy whereof has been appended as Annexure P-4, which information has been supplied to the petitioner under the Right to Information Act by the Mission Director, National Rural Health Mission, Haryana.

The said representation, counsel states, will be submitted to respondent No.3 within a period of one week from today, which may be directed to be considered and Kumar Ramesh 2014.05.30 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.9542 of 2014 {2} decided within some specified time.

In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merit of the case or commenting thereon, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation to the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chairman, District Health and Family Welfare Society-respondent No.3 within a period of one week from today.

If such a representation is filed within the stipulated period, the same shall be considered and decided by said respondent No.3 within a period of ten days of submission of such representation.

In case the claim of the petitioner is not to be accepted, then a well reasoned and speaking order be passed and conveyed to the petitioner forthwith.

May 29, 2014 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) ramesh JUDGE Kumar Ramesh 2014.05.30 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Sheetal vs State of Haryana and Others Same Subject Right to Information