Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Narinder Singh vs State of Punjab and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided May 21, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1141482

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narinder Singh

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt

in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh crwp no.622 of 2014 date of decision : 21st may, 2014 narinder singh …. petitioner versus state of punjab & others …. respondents coram : hon’ble mr.justice surinder gupta **** present : mr.s.l.chander shekhar, advocate for the petitioner. (along with petitioner) mr.b.s. cheema, deputy advocate general, punjab for respondents no.1 to 3. mr.jatinderp pal singh, advocate for respondent no.4. (along with respondent no.4.) amritpreet kaur - in person (alleged detenue).**** surinder gupta, j. (oral) the file sent to the mediation and conciliation centre of this court before lunch break, has been received back. the meeting of the petitioner with his daughter-amritpreet kaur was arranged there. now the parties are satisfied. amritpreet kaur wants to live with her husband-manpreet singh-respondent no.4. in view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with request that a meeting of petitioner-narinder singh and his wife be arranged with amritpreet kaur at makhu. amritpreet kaur and respondent no.4 have no objection to this. crwp no.622 of2014-2- the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. however respondents no.2 and 3 are directed to arrange a meeting of the petitioner-narinder singh and his wife with amritpreet kaur and her husband-manpreet singh-respondent no.4, at some secure place at makhu on 26.05.2014. learned counsel for the petitioner has assured that the petitioner and his wife or any of the relative will not create any trouble or problem or interfere in the matrimonial life of their daughter. respondent no.2 will also ensure the safety and liberty of the couple i.e.amritpreet kaur and respondent no.4 during their meeting with petitioner and his wife. amritpreet kaur, who has been produced in this court by the police, be dropped at place of her choice. 21st may, 2014 (surinder gupta) gupta) ‘raj’ judge raj kumar 2014.05.27 10:25 i attest to the

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.622 OF 2014 DATE OF DECISION : 21st MAY, 2014 Narinder Singh ….

Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ….

Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA **** Present : Mr.S.L.Chander Shekhar, Advocate for the petitioner.

(along with petitioner) Mr.B.S.

Cheema, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for respondents no.1 to 3.

Mr.Jatinderp Pal Singh, Advocate for respondent no.4.

(along with respondent no.4.) Amritpreet Kaur - in person (alleged detenue).**** SURINDER GUPTA, J.

(ORAL) The file sent to the Mediation and Conciliation centre of this Court before lunch break, has been received back.

The meeting of the petitioner with his daughter-Amritpreet Kaur was arranged there.

Now the parties are satisfied.

Amritpreet Kaur wants to live with her husband-Manpreet Singh-respondent no.4.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with request that a meeting of petitioner-Narinder Singh and his wife be arranged with Amritpreet Kaur at Makhu.

Amritpreet Kaur and respondent no.4 have no objection to this.

CRWP No.622 OF2014-2- The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

However respondents no.2 and 3 are directed to arrange a meeting of the petitioner-Narinder Singh and his wife with Amritpreet Kaur and her husband-Manpreet Singh-respondent no.4, at some secure place at Makhu on 26.05.2014.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has assured that the petitioner and his wife or any of the relative will not create any trouble or problem or interfere in the matrimonial life of their daughter.

Respondent no.2 will also ensure the safety and liberty of the couple i.e.Amritpreet Kaur and respondent no.4 during their meeting with petitioner and his wife.

Amritpreet Kaur, who has been produced in this court by the police, be dropped at place of her choice.

21st May, 2014 (SURINDER GUPTA) GUPTA) ‘raj’ JUDGE Raj Kumar 2014.05.27 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial