Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naba Kumar Sarkar Vs. Eastern Coalfields Limited and anr.

Naba Kumar Sarkar vs Eastern Coalfields Limited and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 16, 2014
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1140197

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue
Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naba Kumar Sarkar

Respondent

Eastern Coalfields Limited and anr.

Excerpt

ga no.667 of 20143 ap no.11 of 2008 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction naba kumar sarkar versus eastern coalfields limited & anr. before: the hon'ble justice sanjib banerjee date : 16th may, 2014. appearance: mr.partha ghosh, adv.ms.sanchita barman roy, adv.the court : the application, ga no.667 of 2014, is in aid of ap no.11 of 2008 which is a request under section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. in ap no.11 of 2008, an order was made on february 14, 2008 referring the request to the chief justice to appoint an arbitrator. in the practice that was followed in this court prior to a supreme court directive arresting the same, the judge taking arbitration matters had to process the request under section 11 at the initial stage but the naming of the arbitrator was left to be done either by the chief justice or another judge designated by the chief justice. since it is evident that the arbitrator has not been named, ga no.667 of 2014 and ap no.11 of 2008 are disposed of by appointing mr.kallol bose, advocate, as arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties covered by the arbitration agreement at a consolidated remuneration of rs.3 lakh to be shared by the parties in equal measure. the parties reckon that the reference should take any more than ten weeks from the date of completion of pleadings. the petitioner has agreed to file the statement of claim within a period of four weeks after the summer vacation; the eastern coalfields limited has agreed to file its counterstatement and counter-claim within four weeks thereafter. there will be no order as to costs. urgent certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (sanjib banerjee, j.) kc.

Full Judgment

GA No.667 of 20143 AP No.11 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction NABA KUMAR SARKAR Versus EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED & ANR.

BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 16th May, 2014.

Appearance: Mr.Partha Ghosh, Adv.Ms.Sanchita Barman Roy, Adv.The Court : The application, GA No.667 of 2014, is in aid of AP No.11 of 2008 which is a request under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

In AP No.11 of 2008, an order was made on February 14, 2008 referring the request to the Chief Justice to appoint an arbitrator.

In the practice that was followed in this Court prior to a Supreme Court directive arresting the same, the Judge taking arbitration matters had to process the request under Section 11 at the initial stage but the naming of the arbitrator was left to be done either by the Chief Justice or another Judge designated by the Chief Justice.

Since it is evident that the arbitrator has not been named, GA No.667 of 2014 and AP No.11 of 2008 are disposed of by appointing Mr.Kallol Bose, Advocate, as arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties covered by the arbitration agreement at a consolidated remuneration of Rs.3 lakh to be shared by the parties in equal measure.

The parties reckon that the reference should take any more than ten weeks from the date of completion of pleadings.

The petitioner has agreed to file the statement of claim within a period of four weeks after the summer vacation; the Eastern Coalfields Limited has agreed to file its counterstatement and counter-claim within four weeks thereafter.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(SANJIB BANERJEE, J.) kc.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial