Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V. Babu Vs. State of Kerala

V. Babu vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 02, 2014
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1136854

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Election

Key legal issue
Election

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V. Babu

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....district. offences alleged are under sections 323 and 326 r/w 34 of ipc. apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.2. it is alleged that on 12.02.2014 at about 10.15 am, this petitioner along with co-accused attacked the defacto complainant and caused grievous hurt to the complainant. the allegation is that the other accused attempted to hit at the head of the defacto complainant with an iron block. it was warded off by the complainant and in that process he sustained fracture to his wrist bone.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said act of causing grievous hurt to the complainant was b.a. no. 1839/2014 (d) -2- done by the other accused. he is absconding. the petitioner was totally unaware of the fact that the other accused would take out the iron block and hit at the accused to cause grievous hurt. but, at the same time, if the common intention can be established then the petitioner cannot escape from the liability, the learned public prosecutor submits.4. considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within ten days from today. after interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned magistrate. when applied for bail by the accused, the learned magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioner but on the following conditions: a. the petitioner shall execute a bond for rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for b.a. no. 1839/2014 (d) -3- the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate. if in case the magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties. b. the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the investigating officer and shall appear before the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE2D DAY OF APRIL201412TH CHAITHRA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 1839 of 2014 (D) ------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER

IN CMP4622014 of SESSIONS COURT,KOLLAM DATED2402-2014 CRIME NO. 265/2014 OF KILIKOLLOOR POLICE STATION , KOLLAM ACCUSED(S)/APPLICANT/ACCUSED NO.1: ------------------------------------------------------------------ V. BABU AGED56YEARS S/O VELU, UPPADATHUKZIAHKKATHIL, KANNIMELCHERRY KILLIKOLLOOR P.O., KOLLAM. BY ADVS.SRI.THOMAS J.ANAKKALLUNKAL SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.) COMPLAINANT(S)/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0204-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: JJJ N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

------------------------------------------ B.A. No. 1839 of 2014 (D) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2014 ORDER

The petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No.265/2014 of Kilikolloor Police Station, Kollam District. Offences alleged are under sections 323 and 326 r/w 34 of IPC. Apprehending arrest, this petition is filed for anticipatory bail.

2. It is alleged that on 12.02.2014 at about 10.15 am, this petitioner along with co-accused attacked the defacto complainant and caused grievous hurt to the complainant. The allegation is that the other accused attempted to hit at the head of the defacto complainant with an iron block. It was warded off by the complainant and in that process he sustained fracture to his wrist bone.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said act of causing grievous hurt to the complainant was B.A. No. 1839/2014 (D) -2- done by the other accused. He is absconding. The petitioner was totally unaware of the fact that the other accused would take out the iron block and hit at the accused to cause grievous hurt. But, at the same time, if the common intention can be established then the petitioner cannot escape from the liability, the learned Public Prosecutor submits.

4. Considering all the aspects the following directions are issued: The petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within ten days from today. After interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned Magistrate. When applied for bail by the accused, the learned Magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioner but on the following conditions: a. The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for B.A. No. 1839/2014 (D) -3- the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties. b. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM until further orders. c. The petitioner shall surrender his original passport before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. If he is not having any valid passport, he should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate. d. The petitioner will also file an affidavit that he will abide by all the conditions B.A. No. 1839/2014 (D) -4- as mentioned above and that he will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. e. The petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the learned Magistrate. f. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc. Sd/- N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. to Judge jjj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial