Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Asoke Kumar Paul and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Asoke Kumar Paul and ors. vs State of West Bengal and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 14, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1133965

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
FERA

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

FERA

Key legal issue
FERA

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Asoke Kumar Paul and ors.

Respondent

State of West Bengal and ors.

Excerpt

.....adv.…for the petitioners.mr.tapan coomaar dey, adv.mr.debsoumya basak, adv.…for the respondent nos.3 & 4. mr.aniket mitra, adv.mr.tapas singha ray, adv.…for the respondent nos.5 to 15. the court: this writ petition is directed against an order dated 27th september, 2012 of the assistant housing commissioner-i/west bengal housing board. it has been sought to be conveyed thereby to some of the petitioners that construction of diya housing project, consisting of fifty-four numbers of hig dwelling units in one number of g + 9 storied building on the board’s land at karunamoyee, salt lake, has faced resistance of local elements and that the project has been deserted. it is found on perusal of the judgment and order dated 18th november, 2004 passed by this court on s.a.no.363 of 2003, produced by mr.dey, learned advocate for the respondents 3 and 4, that some of the residents of karunamoyee housing project had questioned the decree of permanent injunction obtained by the board against them and that such appeal had failed. the board had the occasion to approach the civil court for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants in the suit from interfering with its physical possession of 32 cottahs of land, being the suit property, a part of which was to be utilized for construction of diya housing project. it is further submitted by mr.dey that no appeal was filed challenging the judgment and order dated 18th november, 2004. by filing this writ petition, the petitioners seek a direction on the board to proceed with the construction of diya housing project on the board’s land at karunamoyee upon dealing with the unlawful interference of local elements with strong hands. i am of the view that to obviate future complications it would be prudent to direct the petitioners to publish two notices, one in a vernacular daily and the other in the english daily “the statesman”. in such notice shall be mentioned the gist of the grievance of the petitioners and.....

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET WP No.8 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ASOKE KUMAR PAUL & ORS.Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date : 14th March, 2014.

Appearance : Mr.Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharya, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sarajit Sen, Adv.Mr.Sambhu Nath Sardar, Adv.…for the petitioneRs.Mr.Tapan Coomaar Dey, Adv.Mr.Debsoumya Basak, Adv.…for the respondent Nos.3 & 4.

Mr.Aniket Mitra, Adv.Mr.Tapas Singha Ray, Adv.…for the respondent Nos.5 to 15.

The Court: This writ petition is directed against an order dated 27th September, 2012 of the Assistant Housing Commissioner-I/West Bengal Housing Board.

It has been sought to be conveyed thereby to some of the petitioners that construction of Diya Housing Project, consisting of fifty-four numbers of HIG dwelling units in one number of G + 9 storied building on the Board’s land at Karunamoyee, Salt Lake, has faced resistance of local elements and that the project has been deserted.

It is found on perusal of the judgment and order dated 18th November, 2004 passed by this Court on S.A.No.363 of 2003, produced by Mr.Dey, learned advocate for the respondents 3 and 4, that some of the residents of Karunamoyee Housing Project had questioned the decree of permanent injunction obtained by the Board against them and that such appeal had failed.

The Board had the occasion to approach the Civil Court for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants in the suit from interfering with its physical possession of 32 cottahs of land, being the suit property, a part of which was to be utilized for construction of Diya Housing Project.

It is further submitted by Mr.Dey that no appeal was filed challenging the judgment and order dated 18th November, 2004.

By filing this writ petition, the petitioners seek a direction on the Board to proceed with the construction of Diya Housing Project on the Board’s land at Karunamoyee upon dealing with the unlawful interference of local elements with strong hands.

I am of the view that to obviate future complications it would be prudent to direct the petitioners to publish two notices, one in a vernacular daily and the other in the English daily “The Statesman”.

In such notice shall be mentioned the gist of the grievance of the petitioners and the relief that has been claimed in the writ petition, with further indication that anyone desirous of contesting the writ petition, may appear before the Court and do so on 8th April, 2014 when the writ petition shall be listed once again under the heading “Court Application”, marked top .

Let such notice be published within a week from date.

(DIPANKAR DATTA, J.) akb/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial