Full Judgment
3. We have heard ld. DR. The DR pointed out that this notification has been rescinded by Notification 175/89, dated 29-5-1989 and these goods have been imported on 3-10-1989 after the rescinding of the notification.
4. We have considered the submissions and have perused the notification. The submission made by the ld. DR is correct. The notification claimed by the appellants had been rescinded prior to the import of the goods. Therefore, they are not entitled for the benefit of the said notification claimed by them.
5. In that view of the matter, there is no merit in the appeal and hence appeal is rejected.