Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anthru Vs. the Assistant Engineer Kseb

Anthru vs The Assistant Engineer Kseb

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 04, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1125734

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anthru

Respondent

The Assistant Engineer Kseb

Excerpt

.....having come up for admission on0402-2014, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no. 1059 of 2014 (f) --------------------------- appendix petitioner's exhibits ------------------------- exhibit-p1- photostat copy of the sanction order no. 72/1999-2000 dated2403/2000 exhibit-p2- photostat copy of the power sanction order no. pa2101- 02/de2-52/pa2601-02/923/21/2/02 dated nil exhibit-p3-photostat copy of the minimum guarantee agreement no. mgk no. 7/2001 dated2611/2001 exhibit-p4-photostat copy of the sanction order as no.33/01-02/db-2- 62/papa/26/01-02/482 dated2311/2011 exhibit-p5-photostat copy of the application submitted before the ist respondent dated1805/2013 exhibit-p6-photostat copy of the application submitted before the2d respondent dated1805/2013 exhibit-p7- -do- of the representation dated2005/2013 exhibit-p8- -do- of the letter no. db1213-14/krpdy/42/23/05/2013 dated2305/2013 exhibit-p9- -do- of the representation dated0306/2013 exhibit-p10- -do- the petition dated1006/2013 filed before the consumer grievance redressal forum. exhibit-p11- -do- of the order dated0407/2013 in petition no. cgrf- cr/comp.48/13-14 of consumer grievance redressal forum, ernakulam. exhibit-p12- -do- of the statutory appeal dated1107/2013 filed before the state electricity ombudsman. exhibit-p13- -do- of the consent letter dated1307/2013 exhibit-p14- -do- of the complaint notice no. p3952013/916 dated2008/2013. exhibit-p15 -do- of the affidavt statement1009/2013 filed before the ombudsman. exhibit-p16- of the order dated0307/2013 in petition no. cgrf- cr/comp.33/13-14 ext.p17: -do- of the statutory appeal filed before the state electricity ombudsman dt.2.1.2014 respondent(s)' exhibits nil ------------------------ jj /true copy/ p.s.to judge k. surendra mohan,j ------------------------------- w.p(c) no. 1059 of2014---------------------------------- dated this the 4th february, 2014. judgment the petitioner has preferred exts.p12 and p17 appeals, which are.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN TUESDAY, THE4H DAY OF FEBRUARY201415TH MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 1059 of 2014 (F) --------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ANTHRU AGED46YEARS, S/O. SAID, MANAGING PARTNER M/S. STAR PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES, ODAKKALI, ASAMANNOOR ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.NAVAS SRI.T.K.SASIKUMAR SMT.C.S.SIMI RESPONDENTS: ------------------- 1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, KURUPPAMPADY ERNAKULAM DISTRICT683540.

2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL SECTION KURUPPAMPAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT683540.

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTION DIVISION PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT683501.

4. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT683501.

5. THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRPERSON, C G R F CENTRAL REGION, ERNAKULAM682030.

6. THE STATE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN, PALLIKKAVIL BUILDING, OPP. KOCHI CORPORATION REGIONAL OFFICE ANCHUMANA - MAMANAMGALAM TEMPLE ROAD, EDAPALLY KOCHI - 682 024.

7. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

8. UNIVERSAL VENEERS REPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SRI.T.P. MUHAMMED UNIVERSAL VENEERS, ODAKKALY, ASAMANNOOR P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 549. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI.M.A.ABDUL SHUKOOR R BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0402-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 1059 of 2014 (F) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1- PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE SANCTION ORDER

NO. 72/1999-2000 DATED2403/2000 EXHIBIT-P2- PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE POWER SANCTION ORDER

NO. PA2101- 02/DE2-52/PA2601-02/923/21/2/02 DATED NIL EXHIBIT-P3-PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE MINIMUM GUARANTEE AGREEMENT NO. MGK NO. 7/2001 DATED2611/2001 EXHIBIT-P4-PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE SANCTION ORDER

AS NO.33/01-02/DB-2- 62/PAPA/26/01-02/482 DATED2311/2011 EXHIBIT-P5-PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DATED1805/2013 EXHIBIT-P6-PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE2D RESPONDENT DATED1805/2013 EXHIBIT-P7- -DO- OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED2005/2013 EXHIBIT-P8- -DO- OF THE LETTER NO. DB1213-14/KRPDY/42/23/05/2013 DATED2305/2013 EXHIBIT-P9- -DO- OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED0306/2013 EXHIBIT-P10- -DO- THE PETITION DATED1006/2013 FILED BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM. EXHIBIT-P11- -DO- OF THE ORDER

DATED0407/2013 IN PETITION NO. CGRF- CR/COMP.48/13-14 OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT-P12- -DO- OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL DATED1107/2013 FILED BEFORE THE STATE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN. EXHIBIT-P13- -DO- OF THE CONSENT LETTER DATED1307/2013 EXHIBIT-P14- -DO- OF THE COMPLAINT NOTICE NO. P3952013/916 DATED2008/2013. EXHIBIT-P15 -DO- OF THE AFFIDAVT STATEMENT1009/2013 FILED BEFORE THE OMBUDSMAN. EXHIBIT-P16- OF THE ORDER

DATED0307/2013 IN PETITION NO. CGRF- CR/COMP.33/13-14 EXT.P17: -DO- OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE STATE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN DT.2.1.2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL ------------------------ JJ /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE K. SURENDRA MOHAN,J ------------------------------- W.P(C) NO. 1059 OF2014---------------------------------- Dated this the 4th February, 2014. JUDGMENT

The petitioner has preferred Exts.P12 and P17 appeals, which are pending before the sixth respondent. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner when this matter is taken up today is for a direction to the sixth respondent to consider and dispose of the appeals expeditiously. The standing counsel for Kerala State Electricity Board Mr.Sajeev Kumar K.Gopal has no objection to such a direction being issued. This writ petition is therefore disposed of directing the sixth respondent to consider Exts.P12 and P17 appeals and to finally dispose of them as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months of the date of production of a copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Sd/- K. SURENDRA MOHAN Judge jj /True copy/ 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial