Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of Customs Vs. Associated Stone Industries

Collector of Customs vs Associated Stone Industries

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided May 27, 1997
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/11257

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of Customs

Respondent

Associated Stone Industries

Legal References

Reported In
(1998)(98)ELT542TriDel

Excerpt

1. this is a revenue appeal arising out of the order-in-appeal dated 22-3-1991. the importer imported four consignments of diamond gang saw blades. the assessee had classified the same under chapter heading no.82.01/04 of cta, 1975. the importer filed a refund claim which was rejected by the asstt. collector. on appeal, the collector (appeals) accepted the importer's plea for classification of goods under chapter heading 68.01/16(2) of cta, 1975. the revenue is aggrieved with this.it was contended by the ld. dr that the matter has already been decided by the tribunal's judgment in the case of granite (india) v. collector of customs & c. ex. 1990 (50) e.l.t. 536 (t), in the case of c.c. v.manjushree minerals ltd. 1993 (64) e.l.t. 85 (tribunal) and in the case of m/s paharia marbles industries [final order no. c/349/97-b2, dated 18-2-1997] reported in 1997 (92) e.l.t. 645 (tribunal).2. we have heard the ld. representative of the importer's company. on careful consideration and perusal of the judgment of the tribunal cited above, we notice that the issue has already been decided in favour of the revenue. the tribunal has held that the impugned goods are required to be classified under chapter heading 82.01/04 of cta, 1975. in view of these citations, we set aside the impugned order and allow the revenue's appeal.

Full Judgment

1. This is a Revenue appeal arising out of the Order-in-Appeal dated 22-3-1991. The importer imported four consignments of Diamond Gang Saw Blades. The assessee had classified the same under Chapter Heading No.82.01/04 of CTA, 1975. The importer filed a refund claim which was rejected by the Asstt. Collector. On appeal, the Collector (Appeals) accepted the importer's plea for classification of goods under Chapter Heading 68.01/16(2) of CTA, 1975. The Revenue is aggrieved with this.

It was contended by the ld. DR that the matter has already been decided by the Tribunal's judgment in the case of Granite (India) v. Collector of Customs & C. Ex. 1990 (50) E.L.T. 536 (T), in the case of C.C. v.Manjushree Minerals Ltd. 1993 (64) E.L.T. 85 (Tribunal) and in the case of M/s Paharia Marbles Industries [Final Order No. C/349/97-B2, dated 18-2-1997] reported in 1997 (92) E.L.T. 645 (Tribunal).

2. We have heard the ld. Representative of the importer's company. On careful consideration and perusal of the judgment of the Tribunal cited above, we notice that the issue has already been decided in favour of the Revenue. The Tribunal has held that the impugned goods are required to be classified under Chapter Heading 82.01/04 of CTA, 1975. In view of these citations, we set aside the impugned order and allow the Revenue's appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial