Harjinder Kaur @ Billi Vs. Harjinder Kaur @ Billi

Harjinder Kaur @ Billi vs Harjinder Kaur @ Billi

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Feb 05, 2014

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1124476

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1124476
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2014
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harjinder Kaur @ Billi

Respondent

Harjinder Kaur @ Billi

Excerpt

.....3.9.2013 as on that day another accused was also absent and, however, his application for exemption was allowed. however, she even did not appear on the adjourned date, i.e., 3.9.2013. even notice issued to her for that date was received back with the report of refusal and no application for exemption from personal appearance was also filed. learned trial court rightly ordered for cancellation of her bail bonds and surety bonds. now after more than five months of the same, the present application for anticipatory bail has been filed. it has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- accused that she could not appear as she was ill. however, no such meenu application was moved before learned trial court on the date when she 2014.02.06 10:27 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crl.m.no.m-3787 of 2014 (o&m) -2- absented. hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner- accused. without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-harjinder kaur @ billi for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. 5.2.2014 (ram chand gupta) meenu judge meenu 2014.02.06 10:27 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Full Judgment

Crl.M.No.M-3787 of 2014 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl.M.No.M-3787 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 5, 2014 Harjinder Kaur @ Billi .....Petitioner v.

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Mr.B.S.Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner....RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.59, dated 12.9.2011, under Sections 15 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and under Sections 307, 353, 332, 186, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Division Noormahal, District Jalandhar.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the whole record carefully.

Petitioner is one of the accused in the aforementioned case.

She was on bail and facing trial.

However, she absented from the Court on 13.8.2013.

However, trial Court had taken lenient view and notice was issued to her for putting appearance for 3.9.2013 as on that day another accused was also absent and, however, his application for exemption was allowed.

However, she even did not appear on the adjourned date, i.e., 3.9.2013.

Even notice issued to her for that date was received back with the report of refusal and no application for exemption from personal appearance was also filed.

Learned trial Court rightly ordered for cancellation of her bail bonds and surety bonds.

Now after more than five months of the same, the present application for anticipatory bail has been filed.

It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner- accused that she could not appear as she was ill.

However, no such Meenu application was moved before learned trial Court on the date when she 2014.02.06 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh Crl.M.No.M-3787 of 2014 (O&M) -2- absented.

Hence, in view of these facts, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner- accused.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioner-Harjinder Kaur @ Billi for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit.

5.2.2014 (Ram Chand Gupta) meenu Judge Meenu 2014.02.06 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2014 Same Parties Harjinder Kaur @ Billi vs Harjinder Kaur @ Billi Same Subject Education