Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Appellant Vs. Respondent

Appellant vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jan 27, 2014
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1123059

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue
Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Excerpt

.....adv.mr.s.choudhury, adv.mr.d.ghosh, adv., ..for petitioner. the court : this application for winding up has been filed after service of statutory notice under section 434 on the company. no reply has been given to the statutory notice. in fact, the claim is based on advance made to the company by the petitioning creditor of rs.1,95,20,000/- equipments. the agreement between the parties postulated that payments be made by instalments month by month. for purchase of certain there is no dispute with regard to payment of the firs.and second instalment, so also part of the third instalment. thereafter the company defaulted in making payment on and from part of the fourth instalment and the petitioning creditor, left with no alternative, was compelled to issue a termination notice. but such termination notice is of no relevance today as the statutory notice has been issued wherein a demand for payment has been made of sums.the company has not disputed the said claim. even after filing of the winding up application, service was sought to be effected on the company and directions were also sought to be communicated. the firs.service has returned with the endorsement “addressee absent, intimation served, addressee moved”. prior thereto, service was attempted and such service returned as will appear from the postal record that “delivery attempted, addressee therefore, tantamounts affidavit in absent, to opposition intimation good and served, service. therefore the the unclaimed”. company claim of has the this, filed no petitioning creditor is undisputed. in cases where the claim remains undisputed, a petition of this kind will lie as the arbitration clause contemplates a dispute. but here, in the absence of a dispute either by way of reply to the statutory notice or to the petition filed, it cannot be said that there exists a dispute which requires adjudication by arbitration. stands admitted for a sum of therefore the company petition rs.1,87,32,340/-.....

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET CP5062013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE RE : SPOTLIGHT TRADECo.PRIVATE LIMITED -ANDL & T FINANCE LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE NADIRA PATHERYA Date : 27th January, 2014.

Mr.R.Banerjee, Adv., with Mr.P.Sinha, Adv.Ms.M.Bhutoria, Adv.Mr.S.Choudhury, Adv.Mr.D.Ghosh, Adv., ..for petitioner.

The Court : This application for winding up has been filed after service of statutory notice under section 434 on the company.

No reply has been given to the statutory notice.

In fact, the claim is based on advance made to the company by the petitioning creditor of Rs.1,95,20,000/- equipments.

The agreement between the parties postulated that payments be made by instalments month by month.

for purchase of certain There is no dispute with regard to payment of the fiRs.and second instalment, so also part of the third instalment.

Thereafter the company defaulted in making payment on and from part of the fourth instalment and the petitioning creditor, left with no alternative, was compelled to issue a termination notice.

But such termination notice is of no relevance today as the statutory notice has been issued wherein a demand for payment has been made of suMs.The company has not disputed the said claim.

Even after filing of the winding up application, service was sought to be effected on the company and directions were also sought to be communicated.

The fiRs.service has returned with the endorsement “addressee absent, intimation served, addressee moved”.

Prior thereto, service was attempted and such service returned as will appear from the postal record that “delivery attempted, addressee therefore, tantamounts affidavit in absent, to opposition intimation good and served, service.

therefore the The unclaimed”.

company claim of has the This, filed no petitioning creditor is undisputed.

In cases where the claim remains undisputed, a petition of this kind will lie as the arbitration clause contemplates a dispute.

But here, in the absence of a dispute either by way of reply to the statutory notice or to the petition filed, it cannot be said that there exists a dispute which requires adjudication by arbitration.

stands admitted for a sum of Therefore the company petition Rs.1,87,32,340/- along with interest calculated at 8% per annum on and from the date of issuance of the statutory notice till realisation.

Although the petitioning creditor has claimed sums on account of delayed payment charge so also cheque returning and other charges, the same have not been considered in this petition and it will be open to the petitioning creditor to seek remedies for the said sums in an appropriate forum.

An opportunity is being given to the company to make payment of the sum for which the company petition has been admitted in eight equal monthly instalments.

The fiRs.of such instalments be paid by February 14, 2014 and thereafter the 14th day of each succeeding month.

In default of payment of the fiRs.instalment, the petitioning creditor will be entitled to advertise once in the Bartaman and once in The Times of India, Kolkata Edition.

The matter is made returnable six weeks hence.

All parties concerned are to act on a signed photocopy of the order on the usual undertakings.

(NADIRA PATHERYA, J.) tk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial