Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Kseb Rep. by Its Sub Engineer Vs. V. Rahmath

Kseb Rep. by Its Sub Engineer vs V. Rahmath

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Aug 03, 2009
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1111251

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
First Appeal No. 258 of 09 (Arisen out of order dated 13/05/2009 in Case No. OP. 108 of 08 of District Malappuram)
Subject
Consumer

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Consumer

Key legal issue
Consumer

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kseb Rep. by Its Sub Engineer

Respondent

V. Rahmath

Excerpt

justice sri.k.r.udayabhanu: president the appellant is the opposite party in cc.108/08 in the file of cdrf, malappuram. the complaint stands allowed. the appellant/opposite party stood ex parte in the proceedings before the forum. 2. in the circumstances and considering the nature of the dispute involved we find that reconsideration is required. in the result order of the forum is set aside on condition that appellant deposit a sum of rs.2000/- before the forum. on deposit of the amount the forum will permit the opposite party to file version and contest the matter. the forum will issue notice to the complainant the matter will stand posted before the forum on 18.9.09. office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the forum urgently.

Full Judgment

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU: PRESIDENT

The appellant is the opposite party in CC.108/08 in the file of CDRF, Malappuram. The complaint stands allowed. The appellant/opposite party stood ex parte in the proceedings before the Forum.

2. In the circumstances and considering the nature of the dispute involved we find that reconsideration is required. In the result order of the Forum is set aside on condition that appellant deposit a sum of Rs.2000/- before the Forum. On deposit of the amount the Forum will permit the opposite party to file version and contest the matter. The Forum will issue notice to the complainant

The matter will stand posted before the Forum on 18.9.09.

Office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thi... Same Parties Kseb Rep. by Its Sub Engineer vs V. Rahmath Same Subject Consumer Same Judge Justice Sri. K.R. Udayabhanu: President, Smt. Valsala Saranga...
Consumer set aside ex parte

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales