Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Niyas Ahammed Vs. the Manager, Muthoot Conventional Gold Loan Polayathode, Kollam

Niyas Ahammed vs The Manager, Muthoot Conventional Gold Loan Polayathode, Kollam

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Sep 15, 2009
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1111121

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
First Appeal No. 355 of 08 (Arisen out of order dated 31/10/2008 in Case No. CC 23 of 07 of District Kollam)
Subject
Consumer

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Consumer

Key legal issue
Consumer

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Niyas Ahammed

Respondent

The Manager, Muthoot Conventional Gold Loan Polayathode, Kollam

Excerpt

justice sri. k.r. udayabhanu: president the appellant is the complainant in cc.23/07 in the file of cdrf, kollam. the matter relates to the dispute with respect to the interest charged on pledged ornaments. the forum has dismissed the complaint holding that for the case of pledging only create relationship of creditor and debtor and hence the case is not maintainable. 2. both sides have admitted that the position highlighted by the forum is incorrect. it is settled law that the consumer disputes redressal agencies under the consumer protection act has got jurisdiction in the above matters. in the result order the forum is set aside. the matter is remitted back to the forum. forum is directed to adjudicate the matter on merits. the case stands posted before the forum on 2.11.09. office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the forum urgently.

Full Judgment

JUSTICE SRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU: PRESIDENT

The appellant is the complainant in CC.23/07 in the file of CDRF, Kollam. The matter relates to the dispute with respect to the interest charged on pledged ornaments. The Forum has dismissed the complaint holding that for the case of pledging only create relationship of creditor and debtor and hence the case is not maintainable.

2. Both sides have admitted that the position highlighted by the Forum is incorrect. It is settled law that the consumer disputes redressal agencies under the Consumer Protection Act has got jurisdiction in the above matters. In the result order the Forum is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Forum. Forum is directed to adjudicate the matter on merits.

The case stands posted before the Forum on 2.11.09.

Office is directed to forward the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial