Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

V. Madhusoodanan Vs. Vilasini

V. Madhusoodanan vs Vilasini

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Sep 08, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1110063

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
First Appeal No. A/09/31 (Arisen out of order dated in Case No. of District )
Subject
Consumer

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Consumer

Key legal issue
Consumer

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V. Madhusoodanan

Respondent

Vilasini

Excerpt

justice shri.k.r.udayabhanu : president the appellant is the opposite party in cc 82/07 in the file of cdrf, wayanad. the appellant is under orders to pay a sum of rs.90,000/- to the complainant with interest at 6%. 2. the case of the appellant/opposite party is that he was not served with a notice. he has also produced the electoral identity card, which would show his address as 458 e, kangiravila-6, panamaram, mananthavady. 3. we find that the address mentioned in the agreement is the same as mentioned in the complaint. all the same, we find that the order is not a considered one. 4. in the circumstances, the order of the forum is set aside on condition that the appellant/opposite party pay a sum of rs.7000/- towards costs to the complainant or deposit the same before the forum which can be withdrawn by the complainant. the forum will issue notice to the complainant and dispose of the case on merits after permitting both sides to adduce evidence if so they desire. 5. the case stands posted before the forum on 15.11.2010. the office will forward the lcr and along with the copy of this order to the forum urgently.

Full Judgment

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT

The appellant is the opposite party in CC 82/07 in the file of CDRF, Wayanad. The appellant is under orders to pay a sum of Rs.90,000/- to the complainant with interest at 6%.

2. The case of the appellant/opposite party is that he was not served with a notice. He has also produced the Electoral Identity Card, which would show his address as 458 E, Kangiravila-6, Panamaram, Mananthavady.

3. We find that the address mentioned in the agreement is the same as mentioned in the complaint. All the same, we find that the order is not a considered one.

4. In the circumstances, the order of the Forum is set aside on condition that the appellant/opposite party pay a sum of Rs.7000/- towards costs to the complainant or deposit the same before the Forum which can be withdrawn by the complainant. The Forum will issue notice to the complainant and dispose of the case on merits after permitting both sides to adduce evidence if so they desire.

5. The case stands posted before the Forum on 15.11.2010.

The office will forward the LCR and along with the copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial