Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joy John and Others Vs. Mathew Joseph

Joy John and Others vs Mathew Joseph

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Jun 22, 2011
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1109393

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
First Appeal No. A/11/334 (Arisen out of Order Dated 31/01/2011 in Case No. CC/10/193 of District Wayanad)
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joy John and Others

Respondent

Mathew Joseph

Excerpt

justice shri. k.r. udayabhanu: president the appellants are the opposite parties in cc.193/10 in the file of cdrf, wayanad, kalpetta. appellants are under orders to pay a sum of rs.1,02,000/- with interest at 12% from 26/5/2007 and cost of rs.5000/-. the matter is with respect to the non refund of the amount deposited in the opposite parties scheme by name jyothis project. it was assured that the amount would repay within one year in double apart from the amounts received in the prizes of the lottery tickets purchased etc. there was no repayment. the contention of the opposite parties is that the firm could not conduct the business as per the order of the police commissioner, kochiand hence the amount could not be repaid. the evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of pw1 and ext.a1 series. we find that the deposit is evidenced by the receipts produced. the forum has only directed to repay the amount with 12% interest. we find that there is no patent illegality in the order of the forum. there is no scope for admitting the appeal. in the result the appeal is dismissed in-limine. office is directed to forward the lcr to the forum.

Full Judgment

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU: PRESIDENT

The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.193/10 in the file of CDRF, Wayanad, Kalpetta. Appellants are under orders to pay a sum of Rs.1,02,000/- with interest at 12% from 26/5/2007 and cost of Rs.5000/-.

The matter is with respect to the non refund of the amount deposited in the opposite parties scheme by name Jyothis Project. It was assured that the amount would repay within one year in double apart from the amounts received in the prizes of the lottery tickets purchased etc. There was no repayment.

The contention of the opposite parties is that the Firm could not conduct the business as per the order of the Police Commissioner, Kochiand hence the amount could not be repaid.

The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PW1 and Ext.A1 series.

We find that the deposit is evidenced by the receipts produced. The Forum has only directed to repay the amount with 12% interest. We find that there is no patent illegality in the order of the Forum. There is no scope for admitting the appeal.

In the result the appeal is dismissed in-limine.

Office is directed to forward the LCR to the Forum.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial