Sreeprakash and Another Vs. M/S. Apple a Day Properties Pvt.Ltd., Kochi and Another

Sreeprakash and Another vs M/S. Apple a Day Properties Pvt.Ltd., Kochi and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram Decided Jan 21, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1108522

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1108522
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Judge: The Honourable Shri. Justice K.R. Udayabhanu President
Decided On: Jan 21, 2012
Case Number: Complaint Case No. CC/11/29
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sreeprakash and Another

Respondent

M/S. Apple a Day Properties Pvt.Ltd., Kochi and Another

Excerpt

justice sri.k.r. udayabhanu : president the case of the complainant is that they have paid for a flat advertised by the opposite parties proposed to be built. altogether rs.6,49,500/- has been paid. according to the complainants no construction have been made. 2. the opposite parties remained ex-parte. 3. the evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of pw1; exts.p1 to p13. 4. the documents produced and evidence of pw1 do establish the allegation ie a sum of rs.6,49,500/- has been paid to the opposite party in the year 2009. in the circumstances the complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund rs.6,49,500/- with interest at 12% from the respective dates of payment. the opposite parties will also be liable to be pay cost of rs.10000/-. in the result the complaint is allowed as above.

Full Judgment

JUSTICE SRI.K.R. UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENT

The case of the complainant is that they have paid for a flat advertised by the opposite parties proposed to be built. Altogether Rs.6,49,500/- has been paid. According to the complainants no construction have been made.

2. The opposite parties remained ex-parte. 3. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PW1; Exts.P1 to P13.

4. The documents produced and evidence of PW1 do establish the allegation ie a sum of Rs.6,49,500/- has been paid to the opposite party in the year 2009. In the circumstances the complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.6,49,500/- with interest at 12% from the respective dates of payment. The opposite parties will also be liable to be pay cost of Rs.10000/-.

In the result the complaint is allowed as above.

Same Court & Year Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thi... Same Parties Sreeprakash and Another vs M/S. Apple a Day Properties Pvt.Lt... Same Subject MRTP Same Judge The Honourable Shri. Justice K.R. Udayabhanu President