Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ohio Vs. Huertas

Ohio vs Huertas

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-22-1991
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/107185

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
498 U.S. 336
Subject
Other Taxes

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue
Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ohio

Respondent

Huertas

Excerpt

ohio v. huertas - 498 u.s. 336 (1991) u.s. supreme court ohio v. huertas, 498 u.s. 336 (1991) 498 u.s. 336 ohio v. huertas certiorari to the supreme court of ohio no. 89-1944. argued january 16, 1991 decided january 22, 1991 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 51 ohio st. 3d 22, 553 n.e.2d 1058. jonathan e. rosenbaum argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. joann bour-stokes, by appointment of the court, post, p. 935, argued the cause for respondent. with her on the brief were randall m. dana, davis c. stebbins, and richard j. vickers. * [ footnote * ] briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the united states by solicitor general starr, assistant attorney general mueller, deputy solicitor general bryson, and paul j. larkin, jr.; and for the washington legal foundation et al. by daniel j. popeo and paul d. kamenar. briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the national jury project by samuel r. gross; for the national legal aid and defender association by jennifer p. lyman; and for barbara babcock et al. by louis d. bilionis and richard a. rosen. briefs of amici curiae were filed for the state of california by john k. van de kamp, attorney general, richard b. iglehart, chief assistant attorney general, harley d. mayfield, senior assistant attorney general, frederick r. millar, supervising deputy attorney general, and jay m. bloom, deputy attorney general; for the appellate committee of the california district attorneys association by ira reiner, harry b. sondheim, and martha e. bellinger; for murder victims' families for reconciliation by vivian berger; and for the national association of criminal defense lawyers et al. by margery malkin koosed, harry r. reinhart, and dennis balske. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 498 u.s. 336, 337

Full Judgment

OHIO v. HUERTAS - 498 U.S. 336 (1991)
U.S. Supreme Court OHIO v. HUERTAS, 498 U.S. 336 (1991) 498 U.S. 336

OHIO v. HUERTAS
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

No. 89-1944.

Argued January 16, 1991
Decided January 22, 1991

    Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 51 Ohio St. 3d 22, 553 N.E.2d 1058.

Jonathan E. Rosenbaum argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Joann Bour-Stokes, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 935, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Randall M. Dana, Davis C. Stebbins, and Richard J. Vickers. *

[ Footnote * ] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the United States by Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Mueller, Deputy Solicitor General Bryson, and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.; and for the Washington Legal Foundation et al. by Daniel J. Popeo and Paul D. Kamenar.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the National Jury Project by Samuel R. Gross; for the National Legal Aid and Defender Association by Jennifer P. Lyman; and for Barbara Babcock et al. by Louis D. Bilionis and Richard A. Rosen.

Briefs of amici curiae were filed for the State of California by John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Harley D. Mayfield, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Frederick R. Millar, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Jay M. Bloom, Deputy Attorney General; for the Appellate Committee of the California District Attorneys Association by Ira Reiner, Harry B. Sondheim, and Martha E. Bellinger; for Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation by Vivian Berger; and for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al. by Margery Malkin Koosed, Harry R. Reinhart, and Dennis Balske.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 498 U.S. 336, 337



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial