Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

White Vs. United States

White vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-16-1989
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/106709

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
493 U.S. 5
Subject
FERA

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

FERA

Key legal issue
FERA

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

White

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

white v. united states - 493 u.s. 5 (1989) u.s. supreme court white v. united states, 493 u.s. 5 (1989) 493 u.s. 5 white, executor of the estate of smith v. united states et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit no. 88-928. argued october 3, 1989 decided october 16, 1989 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 853 f.2d 107 . kenneth a. payment argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs was james m. white, pro se. alan i. horowitz argued the cause for respondents. with him on the brief were solicitor general starr, assistant attorney general peterson, deputy solicitor general wallace, charles e. brookhart, and joan i. oppenheimer. * per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. justice white dissents. [ footnote * ] waller h. horsley, louis a. craco, charles e. heming, jonathan g. blattmachr, arthur m. sherwood, alexander c. cordes, sanford j. schlesinger, jules j. haskel, albert kalter, thomas p. sweeney, and geraldine s. hemmerling filed a brief for the new york state bar association et al. as amici curiae urging reversal. page 493 u.s. 5, 6

Full Judgment

WHITE v. UNITED STATES - 493 U.S. 5 (1989)
U.S. Supreme Court WHITE v. UNITED STATES, 493 U.S. 5 (1989) 493 U.S. 5

WHITE, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SMITH v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

No. 88-928.

Argued October 3, 1989
Decided October 16, 1989

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 853 F.2d 107 .

Kenneth A. Payment argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was James M. White, pro se.

Alan I. Horowitz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Peterson, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Charles E. Brookhart, and Joan I. Oppenheimer. *

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

JUSTICE WHITE dissents.

[ Footnote * ] Waller H. Horsley, Louis A. Craco, Charles E. Heming, Jonathan G. Blattmachr, Arthur M. Sherwood, Alexander C. Cordes, Sanford J. Schlesinger, Jules J. Haskel, Albert Kalter, Thomas P. Sweeney, and Geraldine S. Hemmerling filed a brief for the New York State Bar Association et al. as amici curiae urging reversal.

Page 493 U.S. 5, 6



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial