Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Appellant Vs. Respondent

Appellant vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 02, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1060306

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Excerpt

order sheet ga no.1179 of 2013 with pla no.270 of 2010 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction original side in the goods of: sabita rani biswas (dec) and in the goods of: krishna bhusan biswas (dec) before: the hon'ble justice i.p.mukerj.date :2. d may, 2013 appearance: ms.divya khetri, adv.ms.debjani ghosh, adv.…for the petitioner. the court : the will in question was jointly executed by husband and wife, sabita rani biswas and krishna bhusan biswas. apart from the executor who is their son the deceased had two heirs on intestacy, smt. madhumita mitra, a daughter and sr.siddharta biswas their son. smt. madhumita mitra was served with the citation on 4th june, 2011 but till date she has not filed any affidavit in support of the caveat. as far as siddharta biswas is concerned, i am satisfied from the report of the office of the sheriff annexed to the petition that he was aware of the contents of the packet sought to be delivered to him by registered post with acknowledgement due and by courier but he did not claim it. when the special messenger went to deliver the packet, he refused to accept it. in those circumstances, i would consider the service of special citation to be good service. a report regarding the mode of service is dated 25th september, 2012. therefore, the time to lodge any caveat or affidavit in support thereof for both smt. madhumita mitra and sr.siddharta biswas had expired long ago. since the above are the only heirs on intestacy i pass an order in terms of prayer (a) of the master’s summons. the department may not process the application for grant of probate accordingly. ad valorem duly payable may be accepted in accordance with law. this application is disposed of by the above order. all parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings. (i.p.mukerji, j.) b.pal a.r.(c.r.)

Full Judgment

ORDER

SHEET GA No.1179 of 2013 With PLA No.270 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF: SABITA RANI BISWAS (DEC) AND IN THE GOODS OF: KRISHNA BHUSAN BISWAS (DEC) BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :

2. d May, 2013 Appearance: Ms.Divya Khetri, Adv.Ms.Debjani Ghosh, Adv.…for the petitioner.

The Court : The Will in question was jointly executed by husband and wife, Sabita Rani Biswas and Krishna Bhusan Biswas.

Apart from the executor who is their son the deceased had two heirs on intestacy, Smt.

Madhumita Mitra, a daughter and Sr.Siddharta Biswas their son.

Smt.

Madhumita Mitra was served with the citation on 4th June, 2011 but till date she has not filed any affidavit in support of the caveat.

As far as Siddharta Biswas is concerned, I am satisfied from the report of the office of the Sheriff annexed to the petition that he was aware of the contents of the packet sought to be delivered to him by registered post with acknowledgement due and by Courier but he did not claim it.

When the special messenger went to deliver the packet, he refused to accept it.

In those circumstances, I would consider the service of special citation to be good service.

A report regarding the mode of service is dated 25th September, 2012.

Therefore, the time to lodge any caveat or affidavit in support thereof for both Smt.

Madhumita Mitra and Sr.Siddharta Biswas had expired long ago.

Since the above are the only heirs on intestacy I pass an order in terms of prayer (a) of the Master’s Summons.

The department may not process the application for grant of probate accordingly.

Ad valorem duly payable may be accepted in accordance with law.

This application is disposed of by the above order.

All parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings.

(I.P.MUKERJI, J.) B.Pal A.R.(C.R.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial