Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Oklahoma Vs. Castleberry

Oklahoma vs Castleberry

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-01-1985
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105949

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
471 U.S. 146
Subject
Other Taxes

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue
Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Oklahoma

Respondent

Castleberry

Excerpt

oklahoma v. castleberry - 471 u.s. 146 (1985) u.s. supreme court oklahoma v. castleberry, 471 u.s. 146 (1985) 471 u.s. 146 oklahoma v. castleberry et al. certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of oklahoma no. 83-2126. argued march 20, 1985 decided april 1, 1985 678 p.2d 720, affirmed by an equally divided court. david w. lee, assistant attorney general of oklahoma, argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were michael c. turpen, attorney general, and hugh a. manning, assistant attorney general. charles foster cox argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents. * [ footnote * ] briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the state of california by john k. van de kamp, attorney general, robert r. granucci, assistant attorney general, and clifford k. thompson, jr., and ronald e. niver, deputy attorneys general; and for americans for effective law enforcement, inc., et al. by fred e. inbau, wayne w. schmidt, james p. manak, david crump, and daniel b. hales. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. justice powell took no part in the decision of this case. page 471 u.s. 146, 147

Full Judgment

OKLAHOMA v. CASTLEBERRY - 471 U.S. 146 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court OKLAHOMA v. CASTLEBERRY, 471 U.S. 146 (1985) 471 U.S. 146

OKLAHOMA v. CASTLEBERRY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA

No. 83-2126.

Argued March 20, 1985
Decided April 1, 1985

    678 P.2d 720, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

David W. Lee, Assistant Attorney General of Oklahoma, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Michael C. Turpen, Attorney General, and Hugh A. Manning, Assistant Attorney General.

Charles Foster Cox argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents. *

[ Footnote * ] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the State of California by John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Robert R. Granucci, Assistant Attorney General, and Clifford K. Thompson, Jr., and Ronald E. Niver, Deputy Attorneys General; and for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., et al. by Fred E. Inbau, Wayne W. Schmidt, James P. Manak, David Crump, and Daniel B. Hales.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 471 U.S. 146, 147



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial