Smith Vs. Florida

Smith vs Florida

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1983

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105567

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/105567
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1983
Case Number: 462 U.S. 1145
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

Florida

Excerpt

.....punishment prohibited by the eighth and fourteenth amendments, i would grant certiorari and vacate petitioner's death sentence on this basis alone. however, even if i accepted the prevailing view that the death penalty can constitutionally be imposed under certain circumstances, i would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence on the ground that neither the jury that convicted petitioner of murder nor the judge who sentenced him found that he "kill[ed], attempt[ed] to kill, or intend[ed] that a killing take place or that lethal force . . . be employed." enmund v. florida, ___ u.s. ___, ___, 3376 (1982). the jury was instructed that "liability for first degree murder extends to all co-felons who are personally present during the commission of the felony" and that "[u]nder the felony murder rule, [ the] state of mind of the defendant is immaterial." tr. 2678. in imposing sentence, the trial judge did not find that petitioner himself killed, attempted to kill, or intended to kill. although the supreme court of florida concluded that "there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found [petitioner] guilty of premeditated murder," 424 so.2d 726, 733 (1982) (emphasis added), neither the jury nor the judge actually made such a finding. under these circumstances our decision in enmund v. florida requires that petitioner's death sentence be vacated.[ smith v. florida 462 u.s. 1145 (1983) ]

Full Judgment

SMITH v. FLORIDA - 462 U.S. 1145 (1983)
U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. FLORIDA , 462 U.S. 1145 (1983)

462 U.S. 1145

Frank SMITH v. FLORIDA
No. 82-6474 Supreme Court of the United States June 20, 1983

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice BRENNAN, dissenting.

Adhering to my views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227 , 2950, 49 L. Ed.2d 859 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.

Justice MARSHALL, dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, I would grant certiorari and vacate petitioner's death sentence on this basis alone. However, even if I accepted the prevailing view that the death penalty can constitutionally be imposed under certain circumstances, I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence on the ground that neither the jury that convicted petitioner of murder nor the judge who sentenced him found that he "kill[ed], attempt[ed] to kill, or intend[ed] that a killing take place or that lethal force . . . be employed." Enmund v. Florida, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 3376 (1982). The jury was instructed that "liability for first degree murder extends to all co-felons who are personally present during the commission of the felony" and that "[u]nder the felony murder rule, [ the] state of mind of the defendant is immaterial." Tr. 2678. In imposing sentence, the trial judge did not find that petitioner himself killed, attempted to kill, or intended to kill. Although the Supreme Court of Florida concluded that "there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found [petitioner] guilty of premeditated murder," 424 So.2d 726, 733 (1982) (emphasis added), neither the jury nor the judge actually made such a finding. Under these circumstances our decision in Enmund v. Florida requires that petitioner's death sentence be vacated.[ Smith v. Florida 462 U.S. 1145 (1983) ]

Same Court & Year US Supreme Court · 1983 Same Parties Smith vs Florida Same Subject Education