Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dongar Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Dongar Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 17, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053540

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dongar Singh

Advocate Shri. R.P.Mishra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.9048/2013 17.06.2013 shri r.p.mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. heard on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 10.04.2013 passed by the commissioner, shahdol, division shahdol whereby the application filed by the petitioner for readmission of his appeal against his removal from the post of secretary has been dismissed on the ground that the petitioner had himself withdrawn the appeal by stating that he had been reinstated as secretary of gram panchayat, kuddi and therefore nothing survives for adjudication. the commissioner in the impugned order has considered the aforesaid aspects as well the fact that there is no change in the circumstances warranting readmission of appeal. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length. the petitioner has himself stated in the petition that he was taken back in service as secretary of gram panchayat, kuddi during the pendency of the appeal before the commissioner and he withdrew the appeal on this count. this fact is reasserted before this court also. in the aforesaid circumstances, i do not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned order dated 10.04.2013 dismissing the application of the petitioner for re-admission of the appeal against his removal from the post of secretary. accordingly the petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed. it is however, observed that in case any cause of action arises in future, the petitioner would be at liberty to take up the proceedings in accordance with law. with the aforesaid observations, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.9048/2013 17.06.2013 Shri R.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 10.04.2013 passed by the Commissioner, Shahdol, Division Shahdol whereby the application filed by the petitioner for readmission of his appeal against his removal from the post of Secretary has been dismissed on the ground that the petitioner had himself withdrawn the appeal by stating that he had been reinstated as Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Kuddi and therefore nothing survives for adjudication.

The Commissioner in the impugned order has considered the aforesaid aspects as well the fact that there is no change in the circumstances warranting readmission of appeal.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length.

The petitioner has himself stated in the petition that he was taken back in service as Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Kuddi during the pendency of the appeal before the Commissioner and he withdrew the appeal on this count.

This fact is reasserted before this court also.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I do not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned order dated 10.04.2013 dismissing the application of the petitioner for re-admission of the appeal against his removal from the post of Secretary.

Accordingly the petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed.

It is however, observed that in case any cause of action arises in future, the petitioner would be at liberty to take up the proceedings in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid observations, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial