Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Surendra Kumar Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Surendra Kumar Dwivedi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 14, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1053009

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surendra Kumar Dwivedi

Advocate Shri. A.P.Singh, Shri. V.K.Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.13802/2013 (s.k.dwivedi versus state of mp and others.14.08.2013 heard shri a.p.singh with shri v.k.shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 29.07.2013 as previous order of transfer dated 03.06.2013 whereby he had been transferred as assistant teacher from the government boys higher secondary school, lalgaon to government primary school mala sankul kendra khaira has been cancelled and he has been directed to join back at lalgaon. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the initial order of transfer dated 03.06.2013 had been passed on the request of the petitioner on account of the fact that he has old ailing parents with nobody to look after them but the authorities have not passed the impugned order cancelling the previous order. having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the aforesaid issue requires to be considered by the respondents/authorities and therefore, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a representation along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition before the authority concerned within 15 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, the same shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter. the petitioner, if so advised, may also move an application for interim relief which shall be considered by the concerned authority at the earliest. till then, the petitioner shall be permitted to work at government primary school mala sankul kendra khaira with the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.13802/2013 (S.K.Dwivedi versus State of MP and otheRs.14.08.2013 Heard Shri A.P.Singh with Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 29.07.2013 as previous order of transfer dated 03.06.2013 whereby he had been transferred as Assistant Teacher from the Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Lalgaon to Government Primary School Mala Sankul Kendra Khaira has been cancelled and he has been directed to join back at Lalgaon.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the initial order of transfer dated 03.06.2013 had been passed on the request of the petitioner on account of the fact that he has old ailing parents with nobody to look after them but the authorities have not passed the impugned order cancelling the previous order.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the aforesaid issue requires to be considered by the respondents/authorities and therefore, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a representation along with a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition before the authority concerned within 15 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, the same shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter.

The petitioner, if so advised, may also move an application for interim relief which shall be considered by the concerned authority at the earliest.

Till then, the petitioner shall be permitted to work at Government Primary School Mala Sankul Kendra Khaira With the aforesaid directions, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial