Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shri a p singh · Page 1 of about 1,237 results (0.366 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 21 1995

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Raipur Alloy Steels Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-21-1995

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1995)(78)ELT44TriDel

1. The issue of eligibility to Modvat credit on Fire Bricks and Dead Burnt Magnesite used in the manufacture of steel arises for determination in the above appeal filed by the Department against the order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1996

S.P. Agarwal Vs. Delhi Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-02-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking (DMC) Service Regulations, 1981; Delhi Municipal Corporation - Sections 98

Reported in : 64(1996)DLT198; (1997)ILLJ285Del; 1996RLR483

Advocate for Appellant : P.Bhushan,; S.K.Singhia,; A.M.Singhvi,;

C.M. Nayar, J. (1) The present petition is directed against the respondents, Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (for short 'D.E.S.U.') for issuance of a writ of mandamus to promote the petitioner to the post of Additional General...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2008

Rakesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-07-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 21(2), 24, 35 and 46; Army Act; Evidence Act; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 44, 45B, 45B(1), 45B(2), 48 and 53(2); Army Rules - Rule 149; Defence Service Regulations

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT663

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Gautam, Adv

T.S. Thakur, J.1. The petitioner is serving as Commandant in the Border Security Force. He is facing trial by the General, Security Force hereinafter referred to as GSFC for disobedience of lawful command given to him,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 12 1988

H.K. Purohit Vs. the University of Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-12-1988

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN305

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Balia

S.M. Jain, J.1. In this write petition the petitioner challenges the selections of respondents Nos. 3 to 8, made by the University of Jodhpur to the posts of Assistant Registrars. By advertisements, latest being of March...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2010

M/S Nandan Auto Tech Ltd. and Another Vs. Cce, Ludhiana

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri K.P. Singh, DR

None present for the appellants. Shri K.P. Singh, DR, present for the respondent. The appellants have neither complied with the order regarding pre-deposit nor have they shown any cause for non-dismissal of the appeal. However, issue,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2006

State (Through Cbi) Vs. Santosh Kumar Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-17-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 6, 45 and 46; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 354 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 311 and 313

Reported in : 2007CriLJ964; 133(2006)DLT393; 2006(92)DRJ87

Advocate for Appellant : A. Sharan, ASG,; Ashok Bhan,; Amit Anand Tiwari,;

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 233 of 2000 seeks to challenge judgment dated 3rd December, 1999 of the Additional Sessions Judge in acquitting the respondent herein of the charges under Sections 302 and 376 IPC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2008

State Vs. R.P. Tyagi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-05-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 19, 34, 109, 114, 114B, 114B(1), 119, 120, 120B, 161, 167, 186, 201, 211, 217, 218, 219, 300, 302, 304, 304(II), 307, 323, 325, 323, 330, 331, 342, 343, 353, 365 and 420; Delhi Police Act - Sections 120 and 124; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 33, 45 and 80; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 270; Prevention of Corruption Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 176, 197, 197(1), 200, 202, 210, 313, 319, 357, 357(1) and 357(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT693

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Dhanda, Adv. in Death Sentence Reference No. 01/2007 and; R.N. Sharma and;

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Death Reference 01/2007 arises out of the impugned judgment dated 13th December, 2006 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, by which the accused R.P. Tyagi posted as the SHO...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1988

Diwan Naubat Rai and ors. Vs. State Through Delhi Administration and a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-02-1988

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 448; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 207, 227, 304(1), 311 and 408(2)

Reported in : AIR1989SC542; 1989CriLJ802; JT1988(4)SC570; 1988(2)SCALE1531; (1989)1SCC297

N.D. Ojha, J.1. The prayer in the writ petitions is for quashing of the proceedings in a case arising out of First Information Report No. 472 dated 3rd May, 1978 under Section 448 I.P.C. P.S. Moti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2013

Noida Entrepreneurs Assocn. Vs. N O I D a and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-27-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.150 OF1997NOIDA Entrepreneurs’ Association ....Petitioner versus New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and others ....Respondents ORDER G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. The legislature of Uttar Pradesh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2010

Jai Devi Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 32 and 32(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 498A; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. and; M. L. Yadav, Adv.

Ajit Bharihoke, J.1. Shiv Kumar s/o Makhan Lal, Raj Kumar @ Kishore Kumar and Ms. Jai Devi w/o Navneet were challaned in Sessions case No. 570/93 FIR No. 120/93 Police Station Vivek Vihar. They were charged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial