Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rohit Sen Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Rohit Sen vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 01, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1050621

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rohit Sen

Advocate Shri. L.N.Tripathi

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

01.08.2012 shri l.n.tripathi, counsel for the applicant. shri chandrakant mishra, govt. advocate for the respondent/ state. heard. this is an application under section 439 of cr.p.c.the applicant has been arrested in connection with crime no.561/2012 registered at police station t.t.nagar, bhopal for offence punishable under section 34(2) of m.p.excise act. as per prosecution, it is alleged that 62 bulk liters illicit country made liquor is said to have been seized from the possession of the applicant. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 31.5.12. he has been falsely implicated in this case. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer for grant of bail. on due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case along with the contention raised on behalf of the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. the application is allowed. it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court/committal court/cj.for his appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c.as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge ravi

Full Judgment

01.08.2012 Shri L.N.Tripathi, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Chandrakant Mishra, Govt.

Advocate for the respondent/ State.

Heard.

This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.561/2012 registered at Police Station T.T.Nagar, Bhopal for offence punishable under Section 34(2) of M.P.Excise Act.

As per prosecution, it is alleged that 62 bulk liters illicit country made liquor is said to have been seized from the possession of the applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 31.5.12.

He has been falsely implicated in this case.

Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case along with the contention raised on behalf of the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant.

The application is allowed.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Committal Court/CJ.for his appearance before the said Court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said Court during trial.

C.C.as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) JUDGE ravi

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial