Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Staats, Vs. Bristol Laboratories

Staats, vs Bristol Laboratories

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-29-1981
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105003

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
451 U.S. 400
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Staats,

Respondent

Bristol Laboratories

Excerpt

staats, v. bristol laboratories - 451 u.s. 400 (1981) u.s. supreme court staats, v. bristol laboratories, 451 u.s. 400 (1981) 451 u.s. 400 staats, comptroller general of the united states, et al. v. bristol laboratories division of bristol-myers co. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 80-264. argued march 24, 1981. decided april 29, 1981. 620 f.2d 17 , affirmed by an equally divided court. mark i. levy argued the cause for petitioners. with him on the briefs were solicitor general mccree, acting assistant attorney general martin, deputy solicitor general geller, michael kimmel, robert kaplan, and milton j. socolar. gilbert h. weil argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was robert l. sherman. * [ footnote * ] philip lacovara, ronald a. stern, stanley l. temko, charles lister, and clare dalton filed a brief for merck & co., inc., et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. justice stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 451 u.s. 400, 401

Full Judgment

STAATS, v. BRISTOL LABORATORIES - 451 U.S. 400 (1981)
U.S. Supreme Court STAATS, v. BRISTOL LABORATORIES, 451 U.S. 400 (1981) 451 U.S. 400

STAATS, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. BRISTOL
LABORATORIES DIVISION OF BRISTOL-MYERS CO.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 80-264.

Argued March 24, 1981.
Decided April 29, 1981.

620 F.2d 17 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mark I. Levy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McCree, Acting Assistant Attorney General Martin, Deputy Solicitor General Geller, Michael Kimmel, Robert Kaplan, and Milton J. Socolar.

Gilbert H. Weil argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert L. Sherman. *

[ Footnote * ] Philip Lacovara, Ronald A. Stern, Stanley L. Temko, Charles Lister, and Clare Dalton filed a brief for Merck & Co., Inc., et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 451 U.S. 400, 401



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial