Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepak Singraha Vs. State Information Commission

Deepak Singraha vs State Information Commission

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049174

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak Singraha

Advocate Shri. G.S.Ahluwalia

Respondent

State Information Commission

Excerpt

w.p.no.18597/2012 (deepak singraha versus s.i.c.& ors.) 12.12.2012 heard shri g.s.ahluwalia, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. the petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondent no.1 to decide appeal no.1931/2012 filed by the petitioner before the said authority on 02.04.2012. it is, however, observed that the petitioner has not filed any application for early or urgent hearing of the appeal before the respondent no.1 but has directly filed this petition before this court. in the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the respondent no.1. it goes without saying that in case the petitioner does so alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the respondent no.1 shall deal with the same expeditiously in accordance with law and pass orders thereon as early as possible. with the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge gn

Full Judgment

W.P.No.18597/2012 (Deepak Singraha versus S.I.C.& ors.) 12.12.2012 Heard Shri G.S.Ahluwalia, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.

The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondent No.1 to decide appeal No.1931/2012 filed by the petitioner before the said authority on 02.04.2012.

It is, however, observed that the petitioner has not filed any application for early or urgent hearing of the appeal before the respondent No.1 but has directly filed this petition before this Court.

In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the respondent No.1.

It goes without saying that in case the petitioner does so alongwith a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition, the respondent No.1 shall deal with the same expeditiously in accordance with law and pass orders thereon as early as possible.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge gn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial