Sunil Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Sunil Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 13, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048940

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048940
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 13, 2012
Subject: Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Election

Key legal issue: Election

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Kumar

Advocate Shri. K.K.Gautam

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.7194/2008 (sunil kumar versus state of mp and others.13.07.2012 heard shri k.k.gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 31.10.2007 passed by the collector, dindouri staying the notification issued in favour of the petitioner declaring him to be secretary of gram panchayat banki. admittedly, the remedy of the petitioner against the aforesaid impugned order lies before the commissioner. the learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to assail the impugned order before the competent authority. in view of the aforesaid request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

W.P.No.7194/2008 (Sunil Kumar versus State of MP and otheRs.13.07.2012 Heard Shri K.K.Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 31.10.2007 passed by the Collector, Dindouri staying the notification issued in favour of the petitioner declaring him to be Secretary of Gram Panchayat Banki.

Admittedly, the remedy of the petitioner against the aforesaid impugned order lies before the Commissioner.

The learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to assail the impugned order before the competent authority.

In view of the aforesaid request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Sunil Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Election