Vinod Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Vinod Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 26, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047153

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047153
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Mar 26, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinod Kumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....who has no criminal past alleged against him. he is ready to co.operate in the investigation. learned counsel further submits that the applicant has tried his level best to compromise the matter before parivar paramars.kendra. he filed the documents in support of the aforesaid contention. it is a matrimonial case wherein in the event of arrest of the applicant, the possibility of compromise between them will be diminished therefore, he prays from grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail. learned counsel for the state opposes the application. keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that the applicant has a good case for grant of bail of anticipatory nature. consequently, this application under section 438 of cr.p.c.is hereby allowed till disposal of the petition. it is directed that in the event of arrest, present applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. he shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of section 438 of cr.p.c.this order shall remain in force till disposal of the anticipatory bail application under section 438, cr.p.c.list the case along with case diary for final hearing in the week commencing 15.4.2013. c.c.today. (g.s.solanki) judge ravi

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.3656/2013 26.3.2013 Shri Vikash Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Puneet Shroti, PL , for the respondent-State.

Heard.

Admit.

Call for the case diary.

Also heard the learned counsel for the parties on IANo.6745/2013 for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail.

Applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.229/13 registered at Police Station Narsinghpur for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 494/34 of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, who has no criminal past alleged against him.

He is ready to Co.operate in the investigation.

Learned counsel further submits that the applicant has tried his level best to compromise the matter before Parivar ParamaRs.Kendra.

He filed the documents in support of the aforesaid contention.

It is a matrimonial case wherein in the event of arrest of the applicant, the possibility of compromise between them will be diminished therefore, he prays from grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the application.

Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has a good case for grant of bail of anticipatory nature.

Consequently, this application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.is hereby allowed till disposal of the petition.

It is directed that in the event of arrest, present applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority.

The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

He shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-Section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.This order shall remain in force till disposal of the anticipatory bail application under Section 438, Cr.P.C.List the case along with case diary for final hearing in the week commencing 15.4.2013.

C.C.today.

(G.S.Solanki) JUDGE ravi

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Vinod Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition