Surendra Kumar Chaubey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Surendra Kumar Chaubey vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 30, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1042027

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1042027
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Nov 30, 2012
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surendra Kumar Chaubey

Advocate Shri. Ravendra Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.20045 / 2012 (surendra kumar chaubey..vs..state of m.p.& ors.) 30-11-2012 heard shri ravendra shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondent/authorities to register a firs.information report against the respondents no.8 to 10 and take suitable action against them. the supreme court in the cases of sakiri vasu v. state of uttar pradesh and others.(2008) 2 scc 40.and divine retreat centre v. state of kerala and others.(2008) 3 scc 54.has categorically laid down that the remedy of petitioner in such circumstances is to take up appropriate proceedings under the provisions of the code of criminal procedure as specified therein. in view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take up appropriate proceedings under the provisions of the code of criminal procedure, as has been held by the supreme court in the aforesaid cases. with the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of accordingly. c.c.as per rules. ( r.s.jha ) judge mct

Full Judgment

W.P.No.20045 / 2012 (Surendra Kumar Chaubey..Vs..State of M.P.& ors.) 30-11-2012 Heard Shri Ravendra Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondent/authorities to register a FiRs.Information Report against the respondents No.8 to 10 and take suitable action against them.

The Supreme Court in the cases of Sakiri Vasu v.

State of Uttar Pradesh and otheRs.(2008) 2 SCC 40.and Divine Retreat Centre v.

State of Kerala and otheRs.(2008) 3 SCC 54.has categorically laid down that the remedy of petitioner in such circumstances is to take up appropriate proceedings under the provisions of the Code of Criminal procedure as specified therein.

In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take up appropriate proceedings under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as has been held by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of accordingly.

C.C.as per rules.

( R.S.Jha ) Judge mct

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Surendra Kumar Chaubey vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Right to Information