Dharmendra Kumar JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Dharmendra Kumar Jain vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 06, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1038816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1038816
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 06, 2013
Subject: Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue: Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dharmendra Kumar Jain

Advocate Shri. Sunil Jain

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.3552/2013 06/05/2013 shri sunil jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. the dispute in question pertains to a dispute arising with regard to payment to the petitioner in relation to a works contract regarding construction of a school building. the agreement in question and clause-29 thereof itself contemplates an arbitration clause for resolution of the dispute between the parties. as the dispute pertains to breach of contract and as in the agreement in question, there a provision for raising the dispute before the arbitrator, a writ petition directly before this court is not maintainable. accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take recours.to the remedy available under law. with the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge nd

Full Judgment

W.P.No.3552/2013 06/05/2013 Shri Sunil Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The dispute in question pertains to a dispute arising with regard to payment to the petitioner in relation to a works contract regarding construction of a school building.

The agreement in question and Clause-29 thereof itself contemplates an arbitration clause for resolution of the dispute between the parties.

As the dispute pertains to breach of contract and as in the agreement in question, there a provision for raising the dispute before the arbitrator, a writ petition directly before this Court is not maintainable.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.to the remedy available under law.

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Dharmendra Kumar Jain vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Arbitration