Henry Vs. Warner

Henry vs Warner

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1973

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/103391

CiteSignal

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/103391
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1973
Case Number: 412 U.S. 1201

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Henry

Respondent

Warner

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes — an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed — then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

..... honorable john e. warner et al. no. a-1124. supreme court of the united states may 18, 1973 on motion to vacate orders staying district court judgment pending disposition of the case by the court of appeals for the ninth circuit. mr. justice douglas, circuit justice. the application for an order vacating the stay of the court of appeals is denied on the representation of the solicitor general that the named movants in the case have all been released from confinement and that within the central district of california no persons are currently confined in any military detention facility as a result of a conviction by summary court-martial without the aid of counsel. whether the district court has authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus for unnamed members of the class outside the district and/or on a world-wide basis is no novel a question that an order granting such relief should be issued only after full argument. application denied.[ henry v. warner 412 u.s. 1201 (1973) ]

Full Judgment

HENRY v. WARNER - 412 U.S. 1201 (1973)
U.S. Supreme Court HENRY v. WARNER , 412 U.S. 1201 (1973)

412 U.S. 1201

Daniel Edward HENRY et al., petitioners,
v.
Honorable John E. WARNER et al.
No. A-1124.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 18, 1973

On motion to vacate orders staying District Court judgment pending disposition of the case by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Circuit Justice.

The application for an order vacating the stay of the Court of Appeals is denied on the representation of the Solicitor General that the named movants in the case have all been released from confinement and that within the Central District of California no persons are currently confined in any military detention facility as a result of a conviction by summary court-martial without the aid of counsel. Whether the District Court has authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus for unnamed members of the class outside the District and/or on a world-wide basis is no novel a question that an order granting such relief should be issued only after full argument. Application denied.[ Henry v. Warner 412 U.S. 1201 (1973) ]