Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Muddeereswara Overseas Traders Vs. Collr. of Cus.

Muddeereswara Overseas Traders vs Collr. of Cus.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Nov 08, 1996
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/10337

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue
Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muddeereswara Overseas Traders

Respondent

Collr. of Cus.

Legal References

Reported In
(1997)(91)ELT644TriDel

Excerpt

.....heading 82.02 reads as follows: "hand saws; blades for saws of all kinds (including slitting, slotting or toothless saw blades)" 8202.32 - - with working part of other materials 8202.40 - - chain saw blades "knives and cutting blades, for machines or for mechanical appliances." 6. the contention of the appellant as seen from the memorandum of appeal is that blades of saws will fall under heading 82.01 if the blades relate to hand tools and the chapter heading will not apply if the blades relate to machines. this contention does not appear to be correct. heading 82.02 refers to blades for saws of all kinds. the heading thus makes a distinction between hand saws and saws of other kinds. the blades referred to in the heading are not only blades of hand saws but blades for saws of all kinds. these are specifically attracted by chapter heading 82.02. therefore, the blades in question cannot fall under heading 82.08.7. we are supported in our view by two decisions of the tribunal in granite (india) v. collector of customs and central excise, 1990 (50) e.l.t. 536 (tribunal) and collector of customs v. manjushree minerals ltd.,1993 (64) e.l.t. 85 (tribunal) holding that saw blades of machines fell under old t.i. 82.01 /04. old tariff heading 82.01 /04 took in hand tools and blades for hand or machine saws. explanatory note (b) to chapter heading 82.02 of hsn at page 1104 refers to saw blades of all kinds, for hand saws and for machines, and for all materials. these aspects support the conclusion we have arrived at that the correct sub-heading is 8202.99, as held by the lower authorities.

Full Judgment

1. Appellant is absent in spite of notice of hearing, though request has been sent for decision on merits.

2. Appellant imported goods described in the invoice, Bill of Entry and other documents as steel shear blades covered by Tariff Heading 8208.90. The goods were assessed to duty under Heading 8203.30.

Appellant moved for re-assessment under Tariff Heading 8208.90 and produced a catalogue which was mostly in foreign language. Assistant Collector rejected the claim and directed reassessment under Heading 8202.99. Collector (Appeals) having dismissed the appeal filed by the importer, the present appeal has been filed.

3. Though the import documents described the goods as steel shear blades, appellant admitted before the lower authorities that the goods were actually blades for Gangsaw Sawing Machine. Goods were actually assessed treating them as falling under sub-heading 8203.30.

"Files, rasps, pliers (including cutting pliers, pincers, tweezers, metal cutting sheers, pipe-cutters, bolt croppers, perforating punches and similar hand tools".

Even according to the importer, the imported goods do not fall under the above description.

4. The controversy is between 82Q2.99 and 8208.90. Heading 82.02 reads as follows: "Hand saws; blades for saws of all kinds (including slitting, slotting or toothless saw blades)" 8202.32 - - With working part of other materials 8202.40 - - Chain saw blades "Knives and cutting blades, for machines or for mechanical appliances." 6. The contention of the appellant as seen from the memorandum of appeal is that blades of saws will fall under Heading 82.01 if the blades relate to hand tools and the Chapter heading will not apply if the blades relate to machines. This contention does not appear to be correct. Heading 82.02 refers to blades for saws of all kinds. The heading thus makes a distinction between hand saws and saws of other kinds. The blades referred to in the heading are not only blades of hand saws but blades for saws of all kinds. These are specifically attracted by Chapter Heading 82.02. Therefore, the blades in question cannot fall under Heading 82.08.

7. We are supported in our view by two decisions of the Tribunal in Granite (India) v. Collector of Customs and Central Excise, 1990 (50) E.L.T. 536 (Tribunal) and Collector of Customs v. Manjushree Minerals Ltd.,1993 (64) E.L.T. 85 (Tribunal) holding that saw blades of machines fell under old T.I. 82.01 /04. Old tariff Heading 82.01 /04 took in hand tools and blades for hand or machine saws. Explanatory Note (B) to Chapter Heading 82.02 of HSN at page 1104 refers to saw blades of all kinds, for hand saws and for machines, and for all materials. These aspects support the conclusion we have arrived at that the correct sub-heading is 8202.99, as held by the lower authorities.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial