Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Richmond School Board Vs. Board of Educ.

Richmond School Board vs Board of Educ.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-21-1973
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/103277

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
412 U.S. 92
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Richmond School Board

Respondent

Board of Educ.

Excerpt

richmond school board v. board of educ. - 412 u.s. 92 (1973) u.s. supreme court richmond school board v. board of educ., 412 u.s. 92 (1973) 412 u.s. 92 school board of city of richmond, virginia, et al. v. state board of education of virginia et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit no. 72-549. argued april 23, 1973 decided may 21, 1973 * 462 f.2d 1058 , affirmed by an equally divided court. [ footnote * ] together with no. 72-550, bradley et al. v. state board of education of virginia et al., also on certiorari to the same court. george b. little argued the cause for petitioners in no. 72-549. with him on the briefs was conrad b. mattox, jr. william t. coleman, jr., argued the cause for petitioners in no. 72-550. with him on the briefs were jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii, norman j. chachkin, louis r. louis, william l. taylor, and anthony g. amsterdam. philip b. kurland argued the cause for respondents in both cases. with him on the brief were edward i. rothschild, andrew p. miller, attorney general of virginia, william g. broaddus and d. patrick lacy, jr., assistant attorneys general, frederick t. gray, walter e. rogers, j. segar gravatt, r. d. mcilwaine iii, l. paul byrne, and j. mercer white, jr. solicitor general griswold argued the cause for the united states as amicus curiae urging affirmance in both cases. with him on the brief were assistant attorney general pottinger, a. raymond randolph, jr., brian k. landsberg, and john c. hoyle.fn fn page 412 u.s. 92, 92 briefs of amici curiae urging reversal in both cases were filed by stephen j. pollak, richard m. sharp, and david rubin for the national education association, and by melvin l. wulf, sanford jay rosen, and philip hirschkop for the american civil liberties union page 412 u.s. 92, 93 et al. margie pitts hames filed a brief for the black parents of atlanta, geor

Full Judgment

RICHMOND SCHOOL BOARD v. BOARD OF EDUC. - 412 U.S. 92 (1973)
U.S. Supreme Court RICHMOND SCHOOL BOARD v. BOARD OF EDUC., 412 U.S. 92 (1973) 412 U.S. 92

SCHOOL BOARD OF CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA, ET AL. v. STATE BOARD OF
EDUCATION OF VIRGINIA ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 72-549.

Argued April 23, 1973
Decided May 21, 1973 *

462 F.2d 1058 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 72-550, Bradley et al. v. State Board of Education of Virginia et al., also on certiorari to the same court.

George B. Little argued the cause for petitioners in No. 72-549. With him on the briefs was Conrad B. Mattox, Jr. William T. Coleman, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners in No. 72-550. With him on the briefs were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman J. Chachkin, Louis R. Louis, William L. Taylor, and Anthony G. Amsterdam.

Philip B. Kurland argued the cause for respondents in both cases. With him on the brief were Edward I. Rothschild, Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General of Virginia, William G. Broaddus and D. Patrick Lacy, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, Frederick T. Gray, Walter E. Rogers, J. Segar Gravatt, R. D. McIlwaine III, L. Paul Byrne, and J. Mercer White, Jr.

Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance in both cases. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Pottinger, A. Raymond Randolph, Jr., Brian K. Landsberg, and John C. Hoyle.Fn

Fn

Page 412 U.S. 92, 92

Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal in both cases were filed by Stephen J. Pollak, Richard M. Sharp, and David Rubin for the National Education Association, and by Melvin L. Wulf, Sanford Jay Rosen, and Philip Hirschkop for the American Civil Liberties Union

Page 412 U.S. 92, 93

et al. Margie Pitts Hames filed a brief for the Black Parents of Atlanta, Georgia, as amicus curiae urging reversal in No. 72-550. Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance in both cases were filed by David I. Caplan for the Jewish Rights Council, and by Harold H. Fuhrman for the National Suburban League, Ltd. Charles S. Conley and Floyd B. McKissick filed a brief for the Congress of Racial Equality as amicus curiae urging affirmance in No. 72-549.

Page 412 U.S. 92, 93

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 412 U.S. 92, 94



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial